BALTIC COOPERATION IN MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING

被引:5
|
作者
Palmowski, T. [1 ]
Tarkowski, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gdansk, Dept Reg Dev Geog, 4 Bazynskiego St, PL-80952 Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Baltic Sea region; European Union; integrated coastal area management; spatial planning; Poland; Russia;
D O I
10.5922/2079-8555-2018-2-7
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Marine spatial planning is a relatively new area of cooperation in the Baltic Sea region-a site of long-term joint efforts towards environmental protection and sustainable development. At the beginning of the 21st century, the integrated management of coastal zones and marine spatial planning emerged as a new area of international cooperation. Despite intensive theoretical work on the mentioned concepts, the development of a harmonised spatial planning in the Baltic Sea region is complicated by the complex nature of the problem, a relatively intensive exploitation of marine resources, diverse interests of the stakeholders, and differences in national institutional systems. We describe the key stages of the process, which is regulated by the EU standards on the one hand and affected by the activity of such organisations as VASAB and HELCOM, on the other. In this article, we examine basic documents defining the principles and scope of marine planning and analyse recent research works into spatial development. We conclude that marine spatial planning is a principal tool of the EU's integrated policy. Many European countries of the Baltic region are seeking cooperation with Russia to preserve the natural and economic environment of the Baltic Sea. Most joint spatial planning projects have been initiated by Finland, Sweden, Germany, and Poland.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 113
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial MCDA in marine planning: Experiences from the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas
    Tammi, Ilpo
    Kalliola, Risto
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2014, 48 : 73 - 83
  • [2] Appropriate scale and level in marine spatial planning - Management perspectives in the Baltic Sea
    Westholm, Aron
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2018, 98 : 264 - 270
  • [3] Imbalances in interaction for transboundary marine spatial planning: Insights from the Baltic Sea Region
    Janssen, Holger
    Varjopuro, Riku
    Luttmann, Anne
    Morf, Andrea
    Nieminen, Hanna
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 161 : 201 - 210
  • [4] Transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region: towards a territorial governance approach?
    Moodie, John R.
    Kull, Michael
    Cedergren, Elin
    Giacometti, Alberto
    Morf, Andrea
    Eliasen, Soren Qvist
    Schroder, Lise
    [J]. MARITIME STUDIES, 2021, 20 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [5] Transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region: towards a territorial governance approach?
    John R. Moodie
    Michael Kull
    Elin Cedergren
    Alberto Giacometti
    Andrea Morf
    Søren Qvist Eliasen
    Lise Schrøder
    [J]. Maritime Studies, 2021, 20 : 27 - 41
  • [6] Towards sustainability of marine governance: Challenges and enablers for stakeholder integration in transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea
    Morf, Andrea
    Moodie, John
    Gee, Kira
    Giacometti, Alberto
    Kull, Michael
    Piwowarczyk, Joanna
    Schiele, Kerstin
    Zaucha, Jacek
    Kellecioglu, Ilhan
    Luttmann, Anne
    Strand, Helena
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 177 : 200 - 212
  • [7] The Marine Spatial Planning Index: a tool to guide and assess marine spatial planning
    Julie M. Reimer
    Rodolphe Devillers
    Rachel Zuercher
    Pascale Groulx
    Natalie C. Ban
    Joachim Claudet
    [J]. npj Ocean Sustainability, 2 (1):
  • [8] Spatial planning in the Baltic States, affected by depopulation
    Gaudesius, Rimvydas
    [J]. GEODESY AND CARTOGRAPHY, 2021, 70 (01):
  • [9] Optimizing cooperation in spatial planning for eGovernment
    Voss, A
    Roeder, S
    Märker, O
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT, 2003, 2645 : 239 - 249
  • [10] European spatial planning and territorial cooperation
    Savini, Federico
    [J]. URBAN RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2011, 4 (03) : 359 - 361