VOLUNTARY CONSUMPTION OF ETHANOL IN 15 INBRED MOUSE STRAINS

被引:468
|
作者
BELKNAP, JK
CRABBE, JC
YOUNG, ER
机构
[1] OREGON HLTH SCI UNIV,DEPT MED PSYCHOL,PORTLAND,OR 97201
[2] OREGON HLTH SCI UNIV,DEPT PHARMACOL,PORTLAND,OR 97201
关键词
ETHANOL; SELF-ADMINISTRATION; ALCOHOL PREFERENCE; PHARMACOGENETICS; STRAIN DIFFERENCES; INBRED STRAINS;
D O I
10.1007/BF02244901
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
To determine genetic differences in ethanol consumption, 15 commonly used inbred strains of mice were given ad libitum two-bottle choice between ethanol, 0.2% saccharin, or ethanol plus saccharin in one bottle versus tap water in the other bottle. Three different concentrations of ethanol were used: 3%, 6% and 10% (v/v). Of the 15 strains, the C57BL/6J, C57BR/cdJ and C57L/J strains showed the most consistent higher intake of ethanol either with or without 0.2% saccharin. In marked contrast, the DBA/1J and DBA/2J strains consistently showed the lowest intake. Consumption of 3% ethanol without saccharin was highly genetically correlated with saccharin consumption (r=0.77), suggesting that low concentrations of ethanol may have a sweet taste that affects voluntary consumption. Most strains showed very different patterns of response to ethanol with or without saccharin. Three patterns of strain responses were identified. Some strains avoided higher concentrations of ethanol whether in water or saccharin; some appeared to be sensitive to the ability of saccharin to mask the odor of ethanol; and some may have reduced consumption only when ethanol concentrations were high enough to produce aversive postingestational effects. Whereas earlier studies generally attempted to explain strain differences in consumption by invoking a single mechanism, our results demonstrate that more than one mechanism is necessary to explain the preferential ethanol intake of all strains studied.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 510
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Voluntary ethanol consumption in 22 inbred mouse strains
    Yoneyama, Naomi
    Crabbe, John C.
    Ford, Matthew M.
    Murillo, Andrea
    Finn, Deborah A.
    [J]. ALCOHOL, 2008, 42 (03) : 149 - 160
  • [2] VOLUNTARY CONSUMPTION OF MORPHINE IN 15 INBRED MOUSE STRAINS
    BELKNAP, JK
    CRABBE, JC
    RIGGAN, J
    OTOOLE, LA
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 112 (2-3) : 352 - 358
  • [3] Voluntary ethanol intake in 22 inbred mouse strains.
    Yoneyama, N
    Belknap, JK
    Crabbe, JC
    Wetzel, A
    Finn, DA
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 28 (05) : 13A - 13A
  • [4] Ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in 15 inbred mouse strains
    Broadbent, J
    Muccino, KJ
    Cunningham, CL
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 116 (01) : 138 - 148
  • [5] USING MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE TO INITIATE VOLUNTARY ETHANOL CONSUMPTION IN 'NON-PREFERRING' INBRED MOUSE LINES
    McCool, B. A.
    Chappell, A. E.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (06) : 92A - 92A
  • [6] NEUROSENSITIVITY TO ETHANOL IN INBRED MOUSE STRAINS - GENETIC CORRELATIONS
    CRABBE, JC
    JANOWSKY, JS
    YOUNG, ER
    RIGTER, H
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE WESTERN PHARMACOLOGY SOCIETY, 1980, 23 : 225 - 227
  • [7] Heritability of ethanol consumption and pharmacokinetics in a genetically diverse panel of collaborative cross mouse strains and their inbred founders
    Bagley, Jared R.
    Chesler, Elissa J.
    Philip, Vivek M.
    Jentsch, James D.
    [J]. ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 45 (04): : 697 - 708
  • [8] DIFFERENCES IN ORAL ETHANOL REINFORCED BEHAVIOR IN INBRED MOUSE STRAINS
    GEORGE, FR
    ELMER, GI
    MEISCH, RA
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 10 (01) : 112 - 112
  • [9] Genetic Relationships Between Ethanol-Induced Conditioned Place Aversion and Other Ethanol Phenotypes in 15 Inbred Mouse Strains
    Cunningham, Christopher L.
    [J]. BRAIN SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (08)
  • [10] Genetic Relationship Between Ethanol-Induced Conditioned Place Preference and Other Ethanol Phenotypes in 15 Inbred Mouse Strains
    Cunningham, Christopher L.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 128 (04) : 430 - 445