TAX REVISION FOR BETTER OR MUCH WORSE

被引：0

作者：

HAYABUSA, N

机构：

来源：

JAPAN QUARTERLY | 1987年 / 34卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

K9 [地理];

学科分类号：

0705 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：124 / 129

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] 1985 TAX BILL COULD BE MUCH WORSE
THURM, G
[J]. JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE TAXATION, 1984, 11 (04): : 374 - 376
[2] For Better or for Worse: Tax Reform in the Netherlands
de Boer, H. W.
[J]. ECONOMIST-NETHERLANDS, 2016, 164 (02): : 125 - 157
[3] For Better or for Worse: Tax Reform in the Netherlands
H. W. de Boer
[J]. De Economist, 2016, 164 : 125 - 157
[4] TAX-REFORM FOR REALTY DEPRECIATION - FOR BETTER OR WORSE
ROULAC, SE
PARISSE, AJ
[J]. TAXES, 1976, 54 (09): : 532 - &
[5] LAW OF COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING - HOW MUCH WORSE IS BETTER THAN GREAT
STERK, SE
[J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1976, 76 (01) : 80 - 112
[6] Low-income housing tax credits increased, for better or worse
Linn, C
[J]. ARCHITECTURAL RECORD, 2001, 189 (06) : 73 - 73
[7] TRADE - NOT MUCH WORSE
不详
[J]. FORTUNE, 1985, 111 (12) : 49 - 49
[8] It could have been worse (much worse)
Farfield, D
[J]. FORBES, 1998, : 134 - 142
[9] FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE
不详
[J]. HOSPITALS, 1985, 59 (05): : 8 - 8
[10] FOR BETTER, FOR WORSE
不详
[J]. LANCET, 1985, 2 (8450): : 315 - 315