Clinical impact of dose overestimation by effective path length calculation in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors

被引:21
|
作者
Liu, Michael B. [1 ]
Eclov, Neville C. W. [1 ]
Trakul, Nicholas [1 ]
Murphy, James [1 ]
Diehn, Maximilian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Le, Quynh-Thu [1 ,2 ]
Dieterich, Sonja [1 ,4 ]
Maxim, Peter G. [1 ,2 ]
Loo, Billy W., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Canc Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Inst Stem Cell Biol & Regenerat Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2012.09.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the clinical impact of calculated dose differences between effective path length (EPL) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung tumors. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed the treatment plans and clinical outcomes of 77 consecutive patients treated with SABR for 82 lung tumors between 2003 and 2009 at our institution. Sixty treatments were originally planned using EPL, and 22 using MC. All plans were recalculated for the same beam specifications using MC and EPL, respectively. The doses covering 95%, 50%, and 5% (D95, D50, D5, respectively) of the target volumes were compared between EPL and MC (assumed to be the actual delivered dose), both as physical dose and biologically effective dose. Time to local recurrence was correlated with dose by Cox regression analysis. The relationship between tumor control probability (TCP) and biologically effective dose was determined via logistic regression and used to estimate the TCP decrements due to prescribing by EPL calculations. Results: EPL overestimated dose compared with MC in all tumor dose-volume histogram parameters in all plans. The difference was > 10% of the MC D95 to the planning target volume and gross tumor volume in 60 of 82 (73%) and 52 of 82 plans (63%), respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 13 of 82 tumors. Controlling for gross tumor volume, higher physical and biologically effective planning target volume D95 correlated significantly with local control (P = .007 and P = .045, respectively). Compared with MC, prescribing based on EPL translated to a median TCP decrement of 4.3% (range, 1.2%-37%) and a > 5% decrement in 46% of tumors. Conclusions: Clinical follow-up for local lung tumor control in a sizable cohort of patients treated with SABR demonstrates that EPL overestimates dose by amounts that substantially decrease TCP in a large proportion. EPL algorithms should be avoided for lung tumor SABR. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 300
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Novel Model to Predict the Overestimation of Pencil Beam Dose Calculation in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Lung Tumors
    Siddiqui, M. U.
    Fraser, C.
    Li, H.
    Liu, D.
    Wen, N.
    Kumar, S.
    Ajlouni, M.
    Levin, K.
    Movsas, B.
    Chetty, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S869 - S869
  • [2] Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Primary Lung Tumors
    Heinzerling, John H.
    Kavanagh, Brian
    Timmerman, Robert D.
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (01): : 28 - 32
  • [3] Vertebral Fractures After Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy of Lung Tumors
    Aguilera, T. A.
    Trakul, N.
    Shultz, D.
    Maxim, P. G.
    Diehn, M.
    Loo, B. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S160 - S161
  • [4] Clinical Impact and Utility of Acuros XB Dose Calculation Algorithm in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Clayton, R.
    Liu, H.
    Lau, H.
    Dunscombe, P.
    Nugent, Z.
    Khan, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S723 - S724
  • [5] Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Subcentimeter Lung Tumors: Clinical, Dosimetric, and Image Guidance Considerations
    Louie, Alexander V.
    Senan, Suresh
    Dahele, Max
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 (04): : 843 - 849
  • [6] Sinoatrial node toxicity after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy to lung tumors
    Qian, Yushen
    Zhu, Han
    Pollom, Erqi L.
    Durkee, Ben Y.
    Chaudhuri, Aadel A.
    Gensheimer, Michael F.
    Diehn, Maximilian
    Shultz, David B.
    Loo, Billy W., Jr.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7 (06) : E525 - E529
  • [7] Clinical Evaluation of Dose Calculation Algorithms in Stereotactic Radiation Therapy fo Lung Cancer
    Tomiyama, Y.
    Araki, F.
    Ono, T.
    Hioki, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [8] Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Lung Tumors Using Helical Tomotherapy: A Cost-effective Treatment Regimen
    Peters, C. A.
    Churilla, T. M.
    Saw, C. B.
    Baikadi, M.
    Brereton, H. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S563 - S564
  • [9] Clinical impact of using the deterministic patient dose calculation algorithm Acuros XB for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Liu, Hong-Wei
    Nugent, Zoann
    Clayton, Ravinder
    Dunscombe, Peter
    Lau, Harold
    Khan, Rao
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2014, 53 (03) : 324 - 329
  • [10] Dosimetric Impact of Four Dose Calculation Algorithms On Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer
    Kusunoki, T.
    Kurooka, M.
    Nonaka, T.
    Yoshino, S.
    Shioiri, K.
    Ide, S.
    Nakayama, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2967 - 2967