Institucional co-authorship network in Information Science: a comparison between net indicators and CAPES's grades

被引:0
|
作者
Alves, Bruno Henrique [1 ]
Pavanelli, Maria Aparecida [1 ]
Tannuri Oliveira, Ely Francina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
EM QUESTAO | 2014年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
Co-authorship networks; Network indicators; CAPES's grades; Centrality degree; Betweenness centrality; Closeness centrality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The objective of this is study is to point inter-institutional partnerships in Information Science formed through co-authorship network. More specifically, we calculate indicators of centrality degree, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality, and analyze the relationships between the grades attributed by CAPES Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - to the institutions and the indicators on the network, checking whether there is proximity and similarity between network indicators and CAPES's grades. Our corpus consisted of all articles published in the four journals in the field of Information Science in Brazil, with regular publications, based in SciVerse Scopus, for the 2010-2012 period. We retrieved 237 articles, 58 co-authored, with 117 participant institutions. We conducted the analysis of relations between institutions with greater grades by CAPES and the network through centrality indicators. It was concluded that these network indicators and CAPES concepts are articulated, harmonizing these two categories of indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 87
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Analysis of network characteristic and community structure of co-authorship network for information science in China
    Meng, Wei
    Pang, Jing'an
    [J]. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2010, 35 (SPECIAL ISSUE 2): : 102 - 106
  • [2] Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network
    Leifeld, Philip
    Wankmueller, Sandra
    Berger, Valentin T. Z.
    Ingold, Karin
    Steiner, Christiane
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):
  • [3] Partnership ability and co-authorship network of information literacy field
    Fatima Baji
    Ismail Mostafavi
    Parastoo Parsaei-Mohammadi
    Zivar Sabaghinejad
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126 : 8205 - 8216
  • [4] The Research on Co-authorship Network in Medical Information Education in China
    Li, Bian
    Wang Xiaoli
    Zhen, Zhao
    [J]. Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education, 2016, 53 : 442 - 447
  • [5] Partnership ability and co-authorship network of information literacy field
    Baji, Fatima
    Mostafavi, Ismail
    Parsaei-Mohammadi, Parastoo
    Sabaghinejad, Zivar
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (09) : 8205 - 8216
  • [6] Two Decades of Network Science as seen through the co-authorship network of network scientists
    Molontay, Roland
    Nagy, Marcell
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM 2019), 2019, : 578 - 583
  • [7] Blockmodeling of co-authorship networks in library and information science in Argentina: a case study
    Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Zaida
    Ferligoj, Anuska
    Miguel, Sandra
    Kronegger, Luka
    de Moya-Anegon, Felix
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 93 (03) : 699 - 717
  • [8] Blockmodeling of co-authorship networks in library and information science in Argentina: a case study
    Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez
    Anuska Ferligoj
    Sandra Miguel
    Luka Kronegger
    Félix de Moya-Anegón
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 93 : 699 - 717
  • [9] A study of interdisciplinarity in information science: using direct citation and co-authorship analysis
    Huang, Mu-Hsuan
    Chang, Yu-Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2011, 37 (04) : 369 - 378
  • [10] Co-authorship networks of scientific elite: case study of information science in Croatia
    Pecaric, Dilda
    Tudman, Miroslav
    [J]. QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN LIBRARIES, 2016, : 49 - 59