Terrorism: a philosophical discourse

Though it is nigh on 12 years since 9/11, there is still no agreed definition of terrorism. Indeed, the original nations of the "Coalition of the Willing," who previously pursued a " War on Terror" so vigorously (Australia, Britain and the USA) have come full circle now to disown entirely the very notion of a "War on Terror." A key stumbling point towards a definition remains whether terrorism should be classified as an act of crime or of war. The two conceptualisations are philosophically and fundamentally opposed and inevitably from each flows entirely different strategic prescriptions to counter the phenomenon. If policy is to be guided adequately, let alone optimally, the philosophical arguments of each camp must be thrown headlong into one another, with the last philosophy standing the victor and then claiming the policy spoils.