In Search of a Common Agenda for Planned Home Birth in America

被引:2
|
作者
Vedam, Saraswathi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Div Midwifery, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION | 2012年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
home childbirth; maternity care; childbearing experiences; childbirth education; informed choice; interprofessional education; interprofessional conflict; birth place options;
D O I
10.1891/1058-1243.21.2.67
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Leading maternity provider organizations in North America have been in conflict about birth at home and birth centers, debating issues related to safety, access, the value of obstetric intervention, and patient autonomy. In today's environment, childbirth educators and doulas are often required to explain to parents why physiological birth and evidence-based, low-technology methods of labor and birth care are not available in every setting, and why maternity providers disagree about birth place. There are very few regions in the United States where home birth providers are integrated into interprofessional provider networks that allow for seamless care across birth settings. In October 2011, multidisciplinary leaders met at a Home Birth Consensus Summit in Warrenton, Virginia, to discuss the status of home birth within the greater context of maternity care in the United States. This article describes the intent and outcomes of the summit. Four of the nine consensus statements developed at the summit are of particular interest and importance to mothers and families and, hence, to childbirth educators and advocates. Consumers, educators, and birth advocates are encouraged to widen the circle, identify communications experts, lead individual projects, or serve as advisors.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 71
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth
    Olsen, Ole
    Clausen, Jette A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (09):
  • [2] Planned home birth
    Dickens, Bernard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 120 (02) : 204 - 205
  • [3] Planned Home Birth
    Simpson, Kathleen Rice
    [J]. MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2013, 38 (05) : 326 - 326
  • [4] Planned Home Birth
    Watterberg, Kristi
    [J]. PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2021, 42 (09) : 526 - 528
  • [5] Planned Home Birth
    Wax, Joseph R.
    Barth, William H., Jr.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (04): : E117 - E122
  • [6] Planned home birth
    Walker, James Johnston
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 43 : 76 - 86
  • [7] Planned home birth is here to stay
    Claessen, Marieke
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2019, 139 (16) : 1536 - 1536
  • [8] Planned home birth: the professional response
    Charalampos, Siristatidis
    Charalampos, Chrelias
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (01) : 72 - 73
  • [9] Perinatal mortality and planned home birth
    Davey, Mary-Ann
    Flood, Margaret M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (04) : E18 - E18
  • [10] POLICY STATEMENT Planned Home Birth
    Watterberg, Kristi L.
    Papile, Lu-Ann
    Baley, Jill E.
    Benitz, William
    Cummings, James
    Carlo, Waldemar A.
    Eichenwald, Eric
    Kumar, Praveen
    Polin, Richard A.
    Tan, Rosemarie C.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (05) : 1016 - 1020