THE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE OF FISH PRODUCTION IN IRAQ

被引:0
|
作者
Mudhie, Abdullah A. [1 ]
Ibrahim, Saad J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dept Agr Econ, Baghdad, Iraq
[2] Univ Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq
[3] Univ Baghdad, Coll Agr, Ctr Desert, Baghdad, Iraq
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Fish production is considered an important part of people's food in different parts of the world. It is also considered an important component of the economies of many countries in the world including Arab countries. Some of these countries are characterized by their efficient production and consequently their comparative advantage on the world scale. The aim of this study is to measure protection coefficients and the comparative advantage of fish production in Iraq. It also aimed at specifying the nature of intervention policy in fish production in Iraq by using policy analysis matrix. Technique through which the efficiency and competitiveness of domestic fish production on world level can be determined. By estimation of policy analysis matrix elements, revenue transfers I, tradable input transfers J, factors transfers K, were calculated which were13724thousand dinars/hectare,-2636 thousand dinars/hectare,-80 thousand dinars/hectare, consecutively. Net transfer L, was about 16440 thousand dinars /hectare, which could be explained that government intervention was in favor of fish producers in short run, the results also showed that domestic producer achieved private profitability by investing in fish projects according to the value of private profitability (D) which was about 7305.6 thousand dinars /hectare in comparison with social profitability (H) which appeared with negative value of about 9136 thousand dinars / hectare. In addition Iraq hasn't a comparative advantage in fish production in comparison with the rest of the world as the value of domestic resource cost (DRC) appeared with negative value of -0.80 in spite of the support which the domestic producer received whether for the product or the subsidies for tradable inputs according to the values of NPCI and producer subsidy ratio which were about 0.81 and %180 respectively. The study arrived at some suggestion according to conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 92
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Advantage in Innovation and Production
    Somale, Mariano
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2021, 13 (03) : 357 - 396
  • [2] Multinational production and comparative advantage
    Alviarez, Vanessa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 119 : 1 - 54
  • [3] COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE IN RICE PRODUCTION IN THAILAND
    AKRASANEE, N
    WATTANANUKIT, A
    [J]. FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE STUDIES, 1976, 15 (02): : 177 - 212
  • [4] The comparative advantage of urban goat production
    Desta, Takele Taye
    [J]. VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [5] The airpower advantage in Iraq
    [J]. Hebert, A.J., 1600, Air Force Association (97):
  • [6] The fish industry in Eritrea: from comparative to competitive advantage
    Teweldemedhin, M. Y.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2008, 3 (05): : 327 - 333
  • [7] ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTION COSTS OF CARP FISH FARMS IN IRAQ
    Al-Thamir, Samira Nema Kamil
    Hnoosh, Laith Jaafar Hussein
    Gleel, Adewia Hekeem
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 22 (02) : 43 - 48
  • [8] ANALYSIS OF THE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE IN WORLD BIOFUEL PRODUCTION
    Perez-Romero, Miriam Edith
    Azuara-Jimenez, Jorge Alberto
    Jimenez-Islas, Donaji
    Ventura-Cruz, Ignacio
    Flores-Romero, Martha Beatriz
    [J]. INQUIETUD EMPRESARIAL, 2022, 2 (02): : 55 - 70
  • [9] INTERREGIONAL COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE OF RICE PRODUCTION IN TAIWAN
    WU, CKH
    MAO, YK
    [J]. FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE STUDIES, 1976, 15 (02): : 233 - 256
  • [10] Comparative advantage of grape production in Fars province
    Mousavi, Seyed Nemat Allah
    Sedghi, Neda
    Akbari, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    [J]. LIFE SCIENCE JOURNAL-ACTA ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY OVERSEAS EDITION, 2011, 8 (03): : 113 - 116