MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF RELIEF PROGRAMS

被引:15
|
作者
HAKEWILL, PA
MOREN, A
机构
[1] United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Geneva
[2] Epicentre, Paris
关键词
D O I
10.1177/00494755910210S106
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Information is power. Every major relief programme of the past 15 years has shown that facts and figures are an indispensable tool for health staff. A simple graph of daily mortality rates can work miracles: mobilize human and material resources, focus the attention of decision-makers, guide and refine the assistance programme that is being put in place. If you want useful data, look at these five areas: (i) mortality; (ii) incidence of the most important diseases; (iii) nutritional status; (iv) 'activities data', such as immunizations performed; and (v) the 'vital sectors', namely food, water, sanitation, shelter, etc. The most effective way of presenting information is graphically, so that anyone can see at a glance the trend from month to month. Finally, there are two golden rules. Always give feedback to the workers out in the field who are the primary source of information. And secondly, always act upon information: if your statistics do not lead to concrete action, you are probably better off not collecting them at all.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 28
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF SOCIAL PROGRAMS
    BOSE, AB
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 1978, 39 (02): : 123 - 128
  • [2] Monitoring and evaluation of rural development programs
    Afable, MCG
    [J]. PLANNING OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC, 2002, : 73 - 79
  • [3] A monitoring and evaluation framework for disaster recovery programs
    Verlin, Aaron
    Argyrous, George
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 33 (01): : 8 - 10
  • [4] Monitoring and evaluation of nutrition programs in developing countries
    Levinson, FJ
    Rogers, BL
    Hicks, KM
    Schaetzel, T
    Troy, L
    Young, C
    [J]. NUTRITION REVIEWS, 1999, 57 (05) : 157 - 164
  • [5] EPIDEMIOLOGIC PRINCIPLES FOR THE EVALUATION OF MONITORING PROGRAMS - THE DUBLIN EXPERIENCE
    GRANT, A
    [J]. CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1993, 16 (02): : 149 - 158
  • [6] Facilitators and barriers to monitoring and evaluation at syringe service programs
    Healy, Elise
    Means, Arianna Rubin
    Knudtson, Kelly
    Frank, Noah
    Juarez, Alexa
    Prohaska, Stephanie
    Mcknight, Courtney
    Des Jarlais, Don
    Asher, Alice
    Glick, Sara N.
    [J]. HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [7] A META DATABASE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMS - CONCEPT AND EVALUATION
    FORSTER, EM
    MATTHIES, M
    PEICHL, L
    MUCKE, W
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 1991, 30 (1-2): : 101 - 107
  • [8] SOCIAL OBJECTIVES OF WORK RELIEF PROGRAMS
    Carlson, Glen E.
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 1936, 20 (04): : 352 - 358
  • [9] Monitoring and evaluation in flour fortification programs: design and implementation considerations
    Pena-Rosas, Juan Pablo
    Parvanta, Ibrahim
    van der Haar, Frits
    Chapel, Thomas J.
    [J]. NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2008, 66 (03) : 148 - 162
  • [10] Prescription drug monitoring programs evaluation: A systematic review of reviews
    Tay, Emma
    Makeham, Meredith
    Laba, Tracey-Lea
    Baysari, Melissa
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2023, 247