Computer Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, and Learning in Online Versus Face to Face Medium

被引:0
|
作者
Hauser, Richard [1 ,2 ]
Paul, Ravi [1 ,2 ]
Bradley, John [1 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, MIS Dept, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Coll Business, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
computer self-efficacy; database self-efficacy; computer anxiety; learning; online medium; computer-based performance; transactional distance; classroom culture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research is to examine the relationships between changes to computer selfefficacy (CSE) and computer anxiety and the impact on performance on computer-related tasks in both online and face-to-face mediums. While many studies have looked at these factors individually, relatively few have included multiple measures of these factors concurrently and assessed the effects over a period of time in a realistic environment. Transactional Distance Theory and previous research are used to develop a theoretical model integrating these factors. Transactional distance can be viewed as an outcome of the culture within an educational environment. As such the three transactional distance variables-structure, dialogue, and learner autonomy-may be measured by certain aspects of that culture. Describing the two mediums in terms of transactional distance allowed us to explore the interrelationships between the changes in CSE, Anxiety, and Performance in face-to-face and online classes. Data are drawn from students in a junior level Management Information Systems (MIS) class at a medium-size public University in the Southeast U.S.A. Classes in both mediums completed a real life computer-based project in which previously validated instruments are used to longitudinally measure perceptions of computer self-efficacy (CSE), computer anxiety, and transactional distance. Partial Least Squares (PLS), a structural equation modeling technique, is used to compare the results of these factors on performance in both the face-to-face and online mediums. The results show transactional distance was indeed acting as an anxiety-reducing mechanism. A comparison of differences between mediums suggests that the various aspects of transactional distance influence each differently. The findings highlight the importance of structure and innovation in the online medium while aspects of dialog were shown to be important in the face-toface medium. In effect, the interactive or emotive characteristics of transactional distance were more important in the face-to-face medium, while the structure and individual autonomy aspects were more influential in the online medium. Thus, one implication for face-to-face instructors is the need to continually maintain free-flowing dialog with the students to enhance learning. On the other hand, logical organization is very important in an online medium. Finally, the significance of the innovation component illustrates the importance of using new techniques and technologies to improve the interaction aspect of online education. Understanding these differences and implementing measures to accommodate these differences could increase teaching effectiveness and ultimately result in improvements in performance on computer-related tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 154
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors Associated with Perceived Self-efficacy in Online and Face-to-Face Flirting Skills
    Romero, Duban
    Rodrigues, David
    Mebarak, Moises
    Martinez, Martha
    [J]. SEXUALITY & CULTURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2024, 28 (02): : 496 - 508
  • [2] Factors Associated with Perceived Self-efficacy in Online and Face-to-Face Flirting Skills
    Duban Romero
    David Rodrigues
    Moisés Mebarak
    Martha Martinez
    [J]. Sexuality & Culture, 2024, 28 : 496 - 508
  • [3] Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender
    Alghamdi, Ahlam
    Karpinski, Aryn C.
    Lepp, Andrew
    Barkley, Jacob
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 102 : 214 - 222
  • [4] Development of Future English Language Teachers' Self-Efficacy Levels: Blended Learning versus Face-to-Face Instruction
    Aristova, Nataliia Oleksandrivna
    Malykhin, Oleksandr
    Melikova, Susanna
    [J]. REVISTA ROMANEASCA PENTRU EDUCATIE MULTIDIMENSIONALA, 2021, 13 (03): : 303 - 318
  • [5] Computer Anxiety in E-Learning: The Effect of Computer Self-Efficacy
    Saade, Raafat George
    Kira, Dennis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-RESEARCH, 2009, 8 : 177 - 191
  • [6] Teamwork attitudes, interest and self-efficacy between online and face-to-face information technology students
    Konak, Abdullah
    Kulturel-Konak, Sadan
    Cheung, Gordon W.
    [J]. TEAM PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (5-6) : 253 - 278
  • [7] Comparison of Online Learning Versus Face to Face Learning in English Grammar Learning
    Anggrawan, Anthony
    Yassi, Abdul Hakim
    Satria, Christofer
    Arafah, Burhanuddin
    Makka, H. Mustafa
    [J]. 2019 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, ENGINEERING, AND DESIGN (ICCED), 2019,
  • [8] English Language Learning Anxiety in Online and Face-to-Face Classes
    Behforouz, Behnam
    Gallema, Marilyn C.
    Waga, Rhona Maria A.
    Al Weshahi, Saif
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2022, 19 (02): : 469 - 488
  • [9] Emergency remote instruction versus face-to-face instruction: precursors and outcomes of online teaching self-efficacy during COVID-19
    Chiasson, Rebekah M.
    Henningsen, Mary Lynn Miller
    [J]. COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2022, 39 (03) : 171 - 180
  • [10] Face-to-face versus computer-mediated discussion of teaching cases: Impacts on preservice teachers' engagement, critical analyses, and self-efficacy
    PytlikZillig, Lisa M.
    Horn, Christy A.
    Bruning, Roger
    Bell, Stephanie
    Liu, Xiongyi
    Siwatu, Kamau O.
    Bodvarsson, Mary C.
    Kim, Doyoung
    Carlson, Deborah
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 36 (04) : 302 - 312