SOLUTE ADJUSTMENT TO SALINITY AND CALCIUM SUPPLY IN CULTIVATED AND WILD BARLEY

被引:18
|
作者
HUANG, J [1 ]
REDMANN, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SASKATCHEWAN, DEPT CROP SCI & PLANT ECOL, SASKATOON, SK S7N 0W0, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01904169509364988
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Ion relations, water content, leaf water potential, and osmotic adjustment were determined for cultivated barley (cv Harrington) and wild barley grown under mixed sulphate (SO4) salts with varied calcium (Ca) supply using a hydroponic system. Salinity induced significant increases of leaf, stem and root sodium (Na) concentrations in both species. Salt-stressed wild barley roots accumulated more Na than shoots, and transport of Na from roots to shoots was low compared to Harrington. Cultivated barley had lower Ca concentrations than wild barley, especially in the low Ca salt treatment. Although potassium (K/Na) and Ca/Na ratios were higher in control wild barley plants than in Harrington, they declined under salt stress, irrespective of Ca supply. Major osmotica in wild barley leaves were K, sugars, organic acids, and quaternary ammonium compounds, while in Harrington they were cations, including Na, K and Mg, and anions such as phosphate (PO4) and SO4. Wild barley maintained better water status than Harrington under low Ca salt treatment. Supplemental Ca improved water status more in Harrington than in wild barley. Lack of osmotic adjustment to salinity in wild barley apparently resulted from its ion exclusion. Low Ca salt treatment caused Ca deficiency, Na toxicity, and loss of turgor in Harrington. In the high Ca salt treatment, Harrington had improved water and ion relations, as well as positive turgor.
引用
收藏
页码:1371 / 1389
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF CULTIVATED AND WILD BARLEY SPECIES TO SALINITY STRESS AND CALCIUM SUPPLY
    SUHAYDA, CG
    REDMANN, RE
    HARVEY, BL
    CIPYWNYK, AL
    CROP SCIENCE, 1992, 32 (01) : 154 - 163
  • [2] Responses of growth, morphology, and anatomy to salinity and calcium supply in cultivated and wild barley
    Huang, J
    Redmann, RE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1995, 73 (12): : 1859 - 1866
  • [3] Carbon balance of cultivated and wild barley under salt stress and calcium deficiency
    Huang, J
    Redmann, RE
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 1996, 32 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [4] Yield Related Traits and Tolerance Indices to Screen Salinity Tolerant Genotypes in Cultivated and Wild Barley
    Ebrahim, F.
    Arzani, A.
    Rahimmalek, M.
    Rezaei, S.
    Cheghamirza, K.
    GESUNDE PFLANZEN, 2022, 74 (04): : 1099 - 1108
  • [5] Responses of cultivated and wild almonds to salinity
    Rahmani, A.
    Sardabi, H.
    Daneshvar, H. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IVTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PISTACHIOS AND ALMONDS, 2006, (726): : 265 - +
  • [6] Short-term solute changes in leaves and roots of cultivated and wild tomato seedlings under salinity
    Bolarin, MC
    SantaCruz, A
    Cayuela, E
    PerezAlfocea, F
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 147 (3-4) : 463 - 468
  • [7] PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES OF CANOLA AND WILD MUSTARD TO SALINITY AND CONTRASTING CALCIUM SUPPLY
    HUANG, J
    REDMANN, RE
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1995, 18 (09) : 1931 - 1949
  • [8] Comparative effect of drought duration on growth, photosynthesis, water relations, and solute accumulation in wild and cultivated barley species
    Mejri, Maroua
    Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
    Saif, Tark
    Abdelly, Chedly
    Hessini, Kamel
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2016, 179 (03) : 327 - 335
  • [9] HORMONAL AND SOLUTE RESPONSE TO SALINITY OF CROWING BARLEY LEAVES
    Akhiyarova, G.
    Veselov, D.
    Fricke, W.
    Kudoyarova, G.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2004, 26 (03) : 21 - 22
  • [10] Genotypic differences in physiological characteristics in the tolerance to drought and salinity combined stress between Tibetan wild and cultivated barley
    Ahmed, Imrul Mosaddek
    Dai, Huaxin
    Zheng, Weite
    Cao, Fangbin
    Zhang, Guoping
    Sun, Dongfa
    Wu, Feibo
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 63 : 49 - 60