BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues

被引:1
|
作者
Meffert, Harma [1 ]
Hwang, Soonjo [1 ]
Nolan, Zachary T. [1 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ]
Blair, James R. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
来源
DATA IN BRIEF | 2016年 / 7卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cognitive control; Go/No-go; fMRI; Generalized psychophysiological interactions; Inhibition;
D O I
10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.011
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also "Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control" [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyms seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 70
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of word frequency and regularity on BOLD activation during go no-go naming
    Cummine, Jacqueline
    Esopenko, Carrie
    Sarty, Gordon E.
    Borowsky, Ron
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2010, 64 (04): : 327 - 328
  • [2] EFFECTS OF PREDICTIVE CUES AND ATTRIBUTES IN A GO NO-GO PARADIGM
    MILLER, J
    SCHAEFFER, R
    HACKLEY, S
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1988, 26 (06) : 522 - 522
  • [3] Dopamine: Go/No-Go motivation versus switching
    Oades, RD
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1999, 22 (03) : 532 - +
  • [4] Does the frequency of 'no-go' cues in a simple go/no-go paradigm alter the pattern of neuronal responses: An fMRI study?
    Lythe, K
    Anderson, IM
    McKie, S
    Richardson, P
    Deakin, JFW
    Elliott, R
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 19 (05) : A54 - A54
  • [5] Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?
    Scholten, Hanneke
    Granic, Isabela
    Chen, Zhang
    Veling, Harm
    Luijten, Maartje
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2019, 34 (05) : 609 - 625
  • [6] EFFECTS OF PRELIMINARY INFORMATION IN A GO VERSUS NO-GO TASK
    MILLER, J
    SCHAFFER, R
    HACKLEY, SA
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1991, 76 (03) : 241 - 292
  • [7] Opposing Effects of Appetitive and Aversive Cues on Go/No-go Behavior and Motor Excitability
    Chiu, Yu-Chin
    Cools, Roshan
    Aron, Adam R.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 26 (08) : 1851 - 1860
  • [8] Prospective associations between brain activation to cocaine and no-go cues and cocaine relapse
    Prisciandaro, James J.
    Myrick, Hugh
    Henderson, Scott
    McRae-Clark, Aimee L.
    Brady, Kathleen T.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2013, 131 (1-2) : 44 - 49
  • [9] Unconscious Activation of the Prefrontal No-Go Network
    van Gaal, Simon
    Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
    Scholte, H. Steven
    Lamme, Victor A. F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (11): : 4143 - 4150
  • [10] Go and no-go P3 with rare and frequent stimuli in oddball tasks: A study comparing key-pressing with counting
    Verleger, Rolf
    Grauhan, Nils
    Smigasiewicz, Kamila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 110 : 128 - 136