A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TRANSCERVICAL AND TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC-VILLUS SAMPLING

被引:131
|
作者
JACKSON, LG
ZACHARY, JM
FOWLER, SE
DESNICK, RJ
GOLBUS, MS
LEDBETTER, DH
MAHONEY, MJ
PERGAMENT, E
SIMPSON, JL
BLACK, S
WAPNER, RJ
机构
[1] GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV,CTR BIOSTAT,WASHINGTON,DC 20052
[2] GENET & INVITRO FERTILIZAT INST,FAIRFAX,VA
[3] YALE UNIV,NEW HAVEN,CT 06520
[4] UNIV TENNESSEE CTR HLTH SCI,MEMPHIS,TN 38163
[5] BAYLOR COLL MED,HOUSTON,TX 77030
[6] CUNY MT SINAI SCH MED,NEW YORK,NY 10029
[7] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[8] ILLINOIS MASONIC MED CTR,CHICAGO,IL 60657
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 1992年 / 327卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM199208273270903
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Chorionic-villus sampling is done in early pregnancy to obtain fetal cells for the prenatal diagnosis of genetic and chromosomal defects. Transcervical chorionic-villus sampling has been shown to be safe and effective in national trials. Recently, an alternative transabdominal technique has been suggested as potentially easier and safer. Methods. From April 1987 through September 1989, we prospectively compared transcervical and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling in 3999 women with singleton pregnancies in whom the risk of a genetically abnormal fetus was increased. Women between 7 and 12 weeks of gestation underwent ultrasonographic evaluation of placental and uterine position. Those with active vaginal infections, active bleeding, or cervical polyps were excluded. If the obstetrician thought either sampling procedure was acceptable, the woman was asked to consent to random assignment to one of the two procedures. Both groups were followed to determine the outcome of pregnancy and the rate of spontaneous fetal loss after chorionic-villus sampling. Results. Among the 3999 women who entered the study, sampling was attempted in 3873 (97 percent), 1944 of whom had been assigned to undergo transcervical sampling and 1929 to undergo transabdominal sampling. Of these 3873 women, sampling was eventually successful in 3863. Sampling was successful after a single insertion of the sampling instrument in 94 percent of the transabdominal procedures and 90 percent of the transcervical procedures. Among the women with cytogenetically normal pregnancies who had sampling because of maternal age, the rate of spontaneous fetal loss through 28 weeks of pregnancy was 2.5 percent in the transcervical-sampling group and 2.3 percent in the transabdominal-sampling group (difference, 0.26 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -0.5 to 1.0 percent). Conclusions. Transabdominal and transcervical chorionic-villus sampling appear to be equally safe procedures for first-trimester diagnosis of fetal abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 598
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF AMNIOCENTESIS AND TRANSABDOMINAL AND TRANSCERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    SMIDTJENSEN, S
    PERMIN, M
    PHILIP, J
    LUNDSTEEN, C
    ZACHARY, JM
    FOWLER, SE
    GRUNING, K
    [J]. LANCET, 1992, 340 (8830): : 1237 - 1244
  • [2] COMPARISON OF AMNIOCENTESIS AND TRANSABDOMINAL AND TRANSCERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    WARD, H
    RODECK, C
    [J]. LANCET, 1993, 341 (8838): : 186 - 187
  • [3] SAMPLING SUCCESS AND RISK BY TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING, TRANSCERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND AMNIOCENTESIS - A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    SMIDTJENSEN, S
    PERMIN, M
    PHILIP, J
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 1 (02) : 86 - 90
  • [4] TRANSABDOMINAL VERSUS TRANSCERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    BORCHERT, F
    SCHWERDTFEGER, RK
    HILFRICH, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1991, 250 (1-4) : 606 - 608
  • [5] COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY LOSS BETWEEN TRANSCERVICAL AND TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    SILVER, RK
    MACGREGOR, SN
    MUHLBACH, LH
    KAMBICH, MP
    RAGIN, A
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (05): : 657 - 660
  • [6] A COMPARISON OF TRANSABDOMINAL (TA) AND TRANSCERVICAL (TC) CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING (CVS)
    SCHULZ, C
    GAMBLE, K
    BURD, L
    BRANDT, T
    BURTON, BK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1991, 49 (04) : 230 - 230
  • [7] Fetal loss following invasive prenatal testing: a comparison of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis
    Niederstrasser, Svenja Laura
    Hammer, Kerstin
    Moellers, Mareike
    Falkenberg, Maria Karina
    Schmidt, Rene
    Steinhard, Johannes
    Klockenbusch, Walter
    Schmitz, Ralf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (02) : 193 - 198
  • [8] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF TRANSABDOMINAL VERSUS TRANSCERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING METHODS
    BRAMBATI, B
    TERZIAN, E
    TOGNONI, G
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1991, 11 (05) : 285 - 293
  • [9] Pain associated with chorionic villus sampling: transabdominal vs transcervical approach
    Wax, Joseph R.
    Davies, Norman P.
    Watson, William J.
    Cartin, Angelina
    Pinette, Michael G.
    Chard, Renee
    Carpenter, Molly
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (04) : 400.e1 - 400.e3
  • [10] TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    MCCORMACK, MJ
    MACKENZIE, WE
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 337 (8736): : 312 - 312