Rationality, political economy, and fiscal responsibility: wrestling with tragedy on the fiscal commons

被引:1
|
作者
Wagner, Richard E. [1 ]
机构
[1] 3G4 George Mason Univ, Dept Econ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
Fiscal commons; Institutional public finance; Antonio De Viti de Marco; Cooperative vs. monopolistic states; Polycentric vs. monocentric polities; State as intermediary; Scalefree modeling;
D O I
10.1007/s10602-012-9119-2
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The continuing budget deficits and accumulating public debt that commonly plagues western democracies reflects a clash between two rationalities regarding human governance: one of private property and its conventions and one of common property and its procedural framework. Democratic budgeting creates a form of fiscal commons whose governance is subject to the tragic outcomes depicted by Garret Hardin (in Science 162: 1243-1248, 1968). To be sure, tragedy can be avoided as Elinor Ostrom (1990) explains, but only to the extent that the fiscal commons is governed in a manner consonant with Antonio De Viti de Marco's (1936) model of the cooperative state. While the tragedy of the commons that results from this tectonic clash is an inherent feature of democratic political economy, that tragedy can nonetheless be limited through reasserting the conventions and institutions of a constitution of liberty.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 277
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条