MULTICENTER EVALUATION OF A BROTH MACRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST FOR YEASTS

被引:184
|
作者
FROMTLING, RA
GALGIANI, JN
PFALLER, MA
ESPINELINGROFF, A
BARTIZAL, KF
BARTLETT, MS
BODY, BA
FREY, C
HALL, G
ROBERTS, GD
NOLTE, FB
ODDS, FC
RINALDI, MG
SUGAR, AM
VILLAREAL, K
机构
[1] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR,MED SERV 111,TUCSON,AZ 85723
[2] UNIV ARIZONA,DEPT MED,TUCSON,AZ 85723
[3] UNIV IOWA HOSP & CLIN,DEPT PATHOL,IOWA CITY,IA 52242
[4] VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,MED COLL VIRGINIA,RICHMOND,VA 23298
[5] MERCK SHARP & DOHME LTD,DEPT INFECT DIS RES,RAHWAY,NJ 07065
[6] INDIANA UNIV HOSP,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46202
[7] ROCHE BIOMED LABS INC,BURLINGTON,NC 27215
[8] SMITHKLINE BEECHAM LABS,DEPT ANTIINFECT L533,KING OF PRUSSIA,PA 19405
[9] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT MICROBIOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
[10] MAYO CLIN,ROCHESTER,MN 55901
[11] EMORY UNIV HOSP,MICROBIOL LAB,ATLANTA,GA 30322
[12] JANSSEN RES FDN,BACTERIOL & MYCOL LAB,B-2340 BEERSE,BELGIUM
[13] UNIV TEXAS,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT PATHOL,SAN ANTONIO,TX 78284
[14] BOSTON UNIV HOSP,SCH MED,BOSTON,MA 02218
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.37.1.39
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Thirteen laboratories collaborated to optimize interlaboratory agreement of results of a broth macrodilution procedure for testing three classes of antifungal drugs against pathogenic yeasts. The activities of amphotericin B, flucytosine, and ketoconazole were tested against 100 coded isolates of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida lusitaniae, Torulopsis (Candida) glabrata, and Cryptococcus neoformans. Two starting yeast inoculum sizes (5 x 10(4) and 2.5 x 10(3) cells per ml) were compared, and readings were taken after 24 and 48 h of incubation. All other test conditions were standardized. The resultant turbidities in all tubes were estimated visually on a scale from 0 to 4+ turbidity, and MIC-0, MIC-1, and MIC-2 were defined as the lowest drug concentrations that reduced growth to 0, 1+, or 2+ turbidity, respectively. For flucytosine, agreement among laboratories varied between 57 and 87% for different inocula, times of incubation, and end point criteria. Agreement was maximized (85%) when the lower inoculum was incubated for 2 days and the MICs were defined as 1+ turbidity or less. For amphotericin B, variations in test conditions produced much smaller differences in interlaboratory agreement. For ketoconazole, interlaboratory agreement was poorer by all end point criteria. However, MIC-2 endpoints distinguished T. glabrata as resistant compared with the other species. Overall, the studies indicated that readings from the lower inoculum obtained on the second day of reading result in the greatest interlaboratory agreement. In combination with data from previous multicenter studies (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Committee Report, Vol. 5, No. 17, 1988; M. A. Pfaller, L. Burmeister, M. S. Bartlett, and M. G. Rinaldi, J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:1437-1441, 1988; M. A. Pfaller, M. G. Rinaldi, J. N. Galgiani, M. S. Bartlett, B. A. Body, A. Espinel-Ingroff, R. A. Fromtling, G. S. Hall, C. E. Hughes, F. C. Odds, and A. M. Sugar, J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1648-1654, 1990), these findings will be used by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards to develop a standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing for yeasts.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 45
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF A BROTH MICRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST WITH A PH INDICATOR - COMPARISON WITH THE BROTH MACRODILUTION PROCEDURES
    FOURNIER, C
    GASPAR, A
    BOILLOT, F
    VILLARD, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1995, 35 (03) : 373 - 380
  • [2] COMPARISON OF BROTH MACRODILUTION, BROTH MICRODILUTION, AND E-TEST ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS FOR FLUCONAZOLE
    SEWELL, DL
    PFALLER, MA
    BARRY, AL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (09) : 2099 - 2102
  • [3] Antifungal susceptibility testing using the E test: Comparison with the broth macrodilution technique
    Chen, SCA
    ODonnell, ML
    Gordon, S
    Gilbert, GL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 37 (02) : 265 - 273
  • [4] COLLABORATIVE COMPARISON OF BROTH MACRODILUTION AND MICRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS
    ESPINELINGROFF, A
    KISH, CW
    KERKERING, TM
    FROMTLING, RA
    BARTIZAL, K
    GALGIANI, JN
    VILLAREAL, K
    PFALLER, MA
    GERARDEN, T
    RINALDI, MG
    FOTHERGILL, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (12) : 3138 - 3145
  • [5] COMPARISON STUDY OF BROTH MACRODILUTION AND MICRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS
    ESPINELINGROFF, A
    KERKERING, TM
    GOLDSON, PR
    SHADOMY, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (06) : 1089 - 1094
  • [6] Flow cytometry susceptibility testing for conventional antifungal drugs and Comparison with the NCCLS Broth Macrodilution Test
    Najafzadeh, M. J.
    Falahati, M.
    Pooshanga, Bagheri K.
    Fata, A.
    Fateh, R.
    [J]. DARU-JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 17 (02) : 94 - 98
  • [7] Comparison of the E test with broth microdilution for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts
    Gould, IM
    Milne, K
    Wood, W
    Kunova, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 10 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [8] Saccharomyces cevevisiae infections and antifungal susceptibility studies by colorimetric and broth macrodilution methods
    Tiballi, RN
    Spiegel, JE
    Zarins, LT
    Kauffman, CA
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1995, 23 (04) : 135 - 140
  • [9] Comparison study of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests for the filamentous fungi
    Pujol, I
    Guarro, J
    Llop, C
    Soler, L
    FernandezBallart, J
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (09) : 2106 - 2110
  • [10] Comparison of antifungal susceptibility test methods for yeasts using broth microdilution, EtestTM and Fungitest
    Perovic, O.
    Rosmarin, C.
    Wadula, J.
    Gould, S.
    McCarthy, K.
    Orton, D.
    Antelme, D.
    Bhagoobhai, L.
    Duse, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S662 - S662