THE PERCEPTIONS OF MANAGEMENT ON THE BENEFITS OF ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEM AS A WASTE MANAGEMENT TOOL

被引:5
|
作者
Doorasamy, Mishelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
关键词
environmental performance; environmental management accounting systems; cleaner production; waste management;
D O I
10.1515/fman-2016-0008
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to ascertain the perception of management on the benefits of adopting an environmental management accounting (EMA) system as a waste management tool in a paper and pulp manufacturing company. This paper highlights the benefits of an EMA system and the role and importance of EMA as a decision-making tool in encouraging the adoption of cleaner production (CP) techniques and technologies. This research was based on a case study of a paper and pulp manufacturing company in KwaZulu-Natal. This research was both quantitative and qualitative in nature. Data collection instruments for the study included a Likert-type questionnaire and interviews with the environmental manager and cost accountant but the findings reported in this paper are based on the empirical evidence gathered from the questionnaire which identified that there was positive correlation between environmental performance and CP techniques and technologies. Environmental costs were hidden under general overheads and understated because the company was using a conventional costing system and not an EMA system; hence, environmental costs were not traced back to the products or processes responsible for those costs. It was evident from the qualitative data analysis that management regarded their environmental costs as too insignificant to justify implementation of an EMA system. The consequent reluctance of the company to adopt CP resulted in poor waste management and lower-quality environmental performance.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 106
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental management accounting in local government A case of waste management
    Qian, Wei
    Burritt, Roger
    Monroe, Gary
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2011, 24 (01): : 93 - 128
  • [2] Forest assets and environmental benefits in management accounting
    Joebstl, Hans A.
    [J]. AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2009, 126 (1-2): : 5 - 19
  • [3] What are the benefits and difficulties in adopting an environmental management system? The opinion of Italian organizations
    Mazzi, Anna
    Toniolo, Sara
    Mason, Marco
    Aguiari, Filippo
    Scipioni, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 139 : 873 - 885
  • [4] Environmental accounting of a waste management system: outcomes from the emergy analysis
    Granai, C.
    Pulselli, R. M.
    Ridolfi, R.
    [J]. BROWNFIELD SITES III: PREVENTION, ASSESSMENT, REHABILITATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF BROWNFIELD SITES, 2006, 94 : 31 - +
  • [5] Waste management: A tool for environmental protection in Nigeria
    Ogbonna, DN
    Ekweozor, IKE
    Igwe, FU
    [J]. AMBIO, 2002, 31 (01) : 55 - 57
  • [6] Logistics of Waste Streams as a Tool of Environmental Management
    Starostka-Patyk, Marta
    [J]. MANAGEMENT 2012: RESEARCH IN MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS IN THE LIGHT OF PRACTICAL NEEDS, 2012, : 496 - 500
  • [7] Environmental management accounting practices, management system, and performance SEM approach
    Fuzi, Nursyazwani Mohd
    Habidin, Nurul Fadly
    Janudin, Sharul Effendy
    Ong, Sharon Yong Yee
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 37 (9-10) : 1165 - 1182
  • [8] YOUR COST SYSTEM - MANAGEMENT OR ACCOUNTING TOOL
    DEWELT, RL
    [J]. MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 1977, 78 (05): : 50 - 55
  • [9] Environmental and economic benefits of the recovery of materials in a municipal solid waste management system
    De Feo, Giovanni
    Ferrara, Carmen
    Finelli, Alessio
    Grosso, Alberto
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 40 (07) : 903 - 911
  • [10] Accounting for the Cost of Land and Environmental Costs in the Management Accounting System
    Rudenko, V. S.
    [J]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2010, 8 (03): : 113 - 118