ZOBREST V CATALINA-FOOTHILLS-SCHOOL-DISTRICT - PRIVATE CHOICES AND PUBLIC FUNDING UNDER THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

被引：0

|

作者：

LINDEMAN, DL

机构：

来源：

RUTGERS LAW REVIEW | 1995年 / 47卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：839 / 904

页数：66

相关论文

共 10 条

[1] ZOBREST V CATALINA-FOOTHILLS-SCHOOL-DISTRICT - EQUAL-PROTECTION, NEUTRALITY, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
DIETRICH, JA
[J]. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1994, 43 (04): : 1209 - 1245
[2] WHATS PAST IS PROLOGUE - ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE AFTER ZOBREST V CATALINA-FOOTHILLS-SCHOOL-DISTRICT
HOOD, JM
[J]. WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW, 1994, (05) : 1327 - 1344
[3] ZOBREST V CATALINA-FOOTHILLS SCHOOL-DISTRICT - STRIKING A BALANCE BETWEEN THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE AND RIGHTS OF HANDICAPPED STUDENTS
JOHNSON, J
[J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & EDUCATION, 1994, 23 (01): : 107 - 114
[4] MAKING AID WITHOUT LEMON - ZOBREST V CATALINA-FOOTHILLS-SCHOOL-DISTRICT, 113-S CT-2462 (1993)
PIERCE, LS
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 1994, 63 (01) : 565 - 606
[5] Disability Rights and Religious Liberty in Education: The Story behind Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
Wenger, Regina B.
[J]. JOURNAL OF CHURCH AND STATE, 2020, 63 (04) : 743 - 745
[6] Disability Rights and Religious Liberty in Education: The Story behind Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
Shearer, Tobin Miller
[J]. AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2022, 127 (01): : 520 - 521
[7] Disability Rights and Religious Liberty in Education: The Story behind Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
Wenger, Regina B.
[J]. JOURNAL OF CHURCH AND STATE, 2021, 63 (04) : 743 - 745
[8] DOE V. ELMBROOK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE IMPORTANCE OF REFOCUSING ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE
Karaba, Julie M.
[J]. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2013, 108 (01) : 283 - 310
[9] Constitutional law - First amendment - Establishment clause - Fourth circuit holds that a school board policy allowing a religious group to distribute bibles in public schools does not violate the establishment clause. Peck v Upshur County Board of Education, 155 F.3d 274 (4th cir. 1998)
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1999, 112 (06) : 1397 - 1402
[10] CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - SEGREGATION OF MEXICAN-AMERICAN STUDENTS BY PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARDS CONSTITUTES STATE ACTION AND A DENIAL OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW UNDER FOURTEENTH AMENDEMNT - CISNEROS V CORPUS-CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 467 F.2D 142 (5TH CIR 1972)
不详
[J]. HOUSTON LAW REVIEW, 1973, 10 (02) : 502 - 504