Island cartilage vs temporalis fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: A prospective study

Objective: (1) To compare the results of graft take-up and audiological outcome of temporalis fascia versus island cartilage graft in type 1 tympanoplasty. (2) To compare the rate of postoperative retraction of neotympanum in both. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 70 patients of ages ranging from 11 to 50 years with dry subtotal perforation. 35 underwent island cartilage tympanoplasty and 35 underwent type 1 tympanoptasty using temporalis fascia graft. Graft acceptance rates and post -operative audiograms were compared. Results: At one year follow up, the graft take-up rate for temporalis fascia and island cartilage graft were found to be 82.9% and 97.1% respectively, which was found to be statistically significant (p< 0.05). In the temporalis fascia group, two out of 35 patients (5.7%) had retraction of the neo tympanum. There was no incidence of retraction using island cartilage graft. There was no significant difference in the postoperative air -bone gap gain between temporalis fascia graft and island cartilage graft. Conclusion: Island cartilage tympanoplasty shows a high degree of reliability in high risk cases. It has a higher graft take-up rate with no incidence of retraction of neotympanum. Moreover, it provided significant hearing improvement in our patients. (C) 2018 Sociedad Espanola de Otorrinolaringologia y Cirugia de Cabeza y Cuello. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.