The impact of timing of insemination in relation to ovulation on the cycle pregnancy rate of intrauterine insemination and intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination in unexplained infertility

被引:3
|
作者
Elkholi, Dina Gamal Eldeen Y. [1 ]
Nagy, Halah Mohamed [2 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Obstet & Gynecol Fac Med, Tanta, Egypt
[2] Tanta Univ, Clin Pathol Fac Med, Tanta, Egypt
关键词
Unexplained infertility; Intrauterine insemination; Intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination; Controlled ovarian stimulation; Preovulatory and postovulatory insemination;
D O I
10.1016/j.mefs.2015.03.001
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: 1 - To compare the cycle pregnancy rate of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to that of intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination (IUTPI) in unexplained infertility. 2 - To assess the effect of timing of insemination in relation to ovulation on the cycle pregnancy rate of IUI and IUTPI. Design: Prospective randomized study. Main outcome measures: 1 - Cycle pregnancy rate of IUI and IUTPI. 2 - Cycle pregnancy rate of preovulatory and postovulatory insemination. Material and methods: Two groups (A and B), each group included 160 women with unexplained primary infertility. Group A were treated by IUI and group B by IUTPI after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin. Ovulation was by i.m. HCG. At the time of insemination the occurrence of ovulation was checked by transvaginal sonography. Results: After the first treatment cycle 17 patients of group A (10.62%) and 28 patients of group B (17.50%) had ongoing pregnancies (p = 0.0413). After the second treatment cycle 12 patients of group A (8.39%) and 18 patients of group B (19.63%) had ongoing pregnancies (p = 0.0442). After the third treatment cycle 11 patients of group A (8.39%) and 14 patients of group B (12.28%) had ongoing pregnancies (p = 0.0433). After the three treatment cycles 40 patients of group A (25%) and 60 patients of group B (37.50%) had ongoing pregnancies (p = 0.033) and the overall cycle pregnancy rate of group A was 9.21% and group B 14.81% (p = 0.0324). In group A the cycle pregnancy rate of preovulatory insemination was 7.20% and postovulatory 9.76% (p = 0.041). In group B the cycle pregnancy rate of preovulatory insemination was 17.70% and postovulatory 13.0% (p = 0.0322). Five out of 40 pregnancies (12.5%) in group A, and 4 out of 60 pregnancies (6.60%) in group B were twins (p = 0.0431). Conclusion: In unexplained primary infertility IUPI had significantly higher cycle pregnancy rate than IUI. Cycle pregnancy rate of IUI was significantly higher with postovulatory than preovulatory insemination. Cycle pregnancy rate of IUTPI was significantly higher with preovulatory than postovulatory insemination. (C) 2015 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Middle East Fertility Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 10
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of timing of intrauterine insemination in relation to ovulation and the number of inseminations on cycle pregnancy rate in common infertility etiologies
    Ghanem, Mohamad E.
    Bakre, Nagwa I.
    Emam, Mohamad A.
    Al Boghdady, Laila A.
    Helal, Adel S.
    Elmetwally, Abdel Gawad
    Hassan, Mohamad
    Albahlol, Ibrahim A.
    Elzayat, Mostafa M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (03) : 576 - 583
  • [2] Pregnancy predictors in unexplained infertility after intrauterine insemination
    Guan, Huijuan
    Tang, Huaiyun
    Pan, Linqing
    Song, Hang
    Tang, Lisha
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 50 (08)
  • [3] Is there really no improvement in pregnancy rate with double intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility?
    Page, Geert H.
    Visschers, Bianca A. J. T.
    Vanderbeke, Ilse
    Thys, Johan A. C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (05) : E19 - E19
  • [4] Is there really no improvement in pregnancy rate with double intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility? Reply
    Malhotra, Neena
    Karmakar, Debjyoti
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (05) : E20 - E20
  • [5] INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION AND OVULATION STIMULATION AS TREATMENT OF INFERTILITY
    CORSON, SL
    BATZER, FR
    GOCIAL, B
    MAISLIN, G
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1989, 34 (06) : 397 - 406
  • [6] Timing ovulation for intrauterine insemination with a GnRH antagonist
    Gómez-Palomares, JL
    Juliá, B
    Acevedo-Martín, B
    Martínez-Burgos, M
    Hernández, ER
    Ricciarelli, E
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (02) : 368 - 372
  • [7] Randomized comparison of ovulation induction with and without intrauterine insemination in the treatment of unexplained infertility
    Chung, CC
    Fleming, R
    Jamieson, ME
    Yates, RWS
    Coutts, JRT
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (12) : 3139 - 3141
  • [8] Sperm pooling and intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination for mild male factor infertility
    Mamas, E.
    Romiou, F.
    Nikitos, E.
    Mamas, L.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 40 (03): : 415 - 417
  • [9] OVARIAN SUPERSTIMULATION AND INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY
    ABOULGHAR, MA
    MANSOUR, RT
    SEROUR, GI
    AMIN, Y
    ABBAS, AM
    SALAH, IM
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1993, 60 (02) : 303 - 306
  • [10] Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in patients with unexplained infertility
    Coco, L.
    Abruzzo, S.
    Rapisarda, V.
    Santonocito, V.
    Tomaselli, T.
    Zarbo, G.
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI OSTETRICIA E GINECOLOGIA, 2010, 32 (05): : 279 - 283