Using the Terms Experiment, Theory, Model, and Law in Mathematics and Natural Sciences

被引:1
|
作者
Reiners, Christian S. [1 ]
Grossschedl, Joerg [2 ]
Meyer, Michael [3 ]
Schadschneider, Andreas [4 ]
Schaebitz, Frank [5 ]
Struve, Horst [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Inst Chem Didakt, Herbert Lewin Str 2, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Inst Biol Didakt, Herbert Lewin Str 10, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Inst Math Didakt, Gronewaldstr 2, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Inst Phys Didakt, Gronewaldstr 2, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Inst Geog Didakt, Gronewaldstr 2, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Epistemological terms; Mathematics; Science;
D O I
10.1002/ckon.201800056
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Scientific literacy implies an adequate understanding of central notions which characterize scientific reasoning. Nature of Science studies have lead to a general consensus of what experiments, models, theories and laws imply at school. They do not take into account how these terms are handled in recent domain-specific theory and research. In order to come to a closer understanding we analyzed domain-specific literature and conducted a survey into the notions of these terms by interviewing experts of the science subjects and mathematics. The results of literature analysis reveal differences in the meaning of the terms between subjects. Moreover, experts show serious inconsistencies in using the terms. The results will be presented in this paper and can be used as a starting point to draw conclusions for science teacher education.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 333
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条