Jet Cavitation Erosion in Chamfered and Tapered Cylindrical Passages: Comparison with Visualization and Simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Kazama, Toshiharu [1 ]
Noda, Tatsuya [2 ]
机构
[1] Muroran Inst Technol, Coll Design & Mfg Technol, 27-1 Mizumoto Cho, Muroran, Hokkaido 0508585, Japan
[2] Muroran Inst Technol, Grad Sch, 27-1 Mizumoto Cho, Muroran, Hokkaido 0508585, Japan
关键词
cavitation; erosion; jet; hydraulics; oil; chamfer; taper; visualization; experiment; simulation;
D O I
10.1520/MPC20180024
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In hydraulic equipment, a jet cavitation occurs frequently at points wherein oil flows through an orifice and a gap that is due to a high pressure and large pressure difference. These jets typically erode equipment surfaces when the cavitation bubbles collapse. Although the erosion characteristics have been studied for cases wherein jets impinge on surfaces at normal or oblique angles, cavitation erosion has not been studied in cases wherein jets flow parallel to the wall surfaces. This study uses the method outlined in ASTM G134-17, Standard Test Method for Erosion of Solid Materials by Cavitating Liquid Jet, to perform 8-hour-long erosion tests on aluminum specimens and to visualize cavitation jets in transparent acrylic specimens. We test specimens with chamfers and tapers in different orientations and compare the results with numerical simulations to better understand the mechanisms behind cavitation erosion. The inner walls of the chamfered specimens were partially eroded near the downstream chamfered edge, regardless of the chamfer location. During the testing time, the chamfered surfaces and outer surfaces on both ends were not eroded. Erosion pits were visible locally along the convergent and straight paths in the tapered specimen, but the pits did not appear in the divergent-tapered specimen. Visualization and numerical results offer some insights into the pressure dynamics that explain why divergent tapers seem to be effective countermeasures against cavitation erosion in hydraulic equipment.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1057
页数:17
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF TUNNEL AND JET METHODS FOR CAVITATION EROSION TESTING
    COLEMAN, SL
    SCOTT, VD
    MCENANEY, B
    ANGELL, B
    STOKES, KR
    WEAR, 1995, 184 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [2] Joint experiments of cavitation jet: High-speed visualization and erosion test
    Peng, Chi
    Tian, Shouceng
    Li, Gensheng
    Ocean Engineering, 2018, 149 : 1 - 13
  • [3] Joint experiments of cavitation jet: High-speed visualization and erosion test
    Peng, Chi
    Tian, Shouceng
    Li, Gensheng
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 149 : 1 - 13
  • [4] Comparison of Inconel 625 and Inconel 600 in resistance to cavitation erosion and jet impingement erosion
    Hu, H. X.
    Zheng, Y. G.
    Qin, C. P.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2010, 240 (10) : 2721 - 2730
  • [5] Comparison of cavitation erosion test results between vibratory and cavitating jet methods
    Yamaguchi, A.
    Kazama, T.
    Inoue, K.
    Onoue, J.
    Fluid Power Journal, 2001, 8 (06):
  • [7] Numerical simulation of the cavitation micro-jet velocity and erosion on a plane-convex hydrofoil with semicylindrical obstacle
    Hidalgo, V.
    Luo, X.
    Escaler, X.
    Valencia, E.
    Cruz, P.
    29TH IAHR SYMPOSIUM ON HYDRAULIC MACHINERY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 240
  • [8] Visualization and investigation of the erosion process for natural gas hydrate using water jet through experiments and simulation
    Zhang, Yiqun
    Wu, Xiaoya
    Hu, Xiao
    Zhang, Bo
    Lu, Jingsheng
    Zhang, Panpan
    Li, Gensheng
    Tian, Shouceng
    Li, Xinming
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 202 - 216