The cattle crush strategy: trading opportunities for cattle producers

被引:0
|
作者
Acevedo Velez, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Econ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Univ EAFIT, Econ, Medellin, Colombia
来源
ECOS DE ECONOMIA | 2007年 / 11卷 / 25期
关键词
futures markets; fed cattle; feeder cattle; cattle crush; hedging risk; technical analysis; momentum; oscillators; risk management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research shows that it is possible for U.S. cattle feeders to obtain additional profits if a consistent technical strategy for trading is applied to the cattle crush spread. However, when trading costs are introduced, the likelihood of obtaining profit from trading the crush reduces considerably. It also shows that the level of gains from the cattle crush is related to the month the cattle are marketed. When the crush is used as a hedging strategy it decreases the profit from the feeding operation and reduces the volatility of those returns, helping producers to transfer part of the price risk associated with their production. To provide evidence of these findings, this study utilizes daily prices for 1995 to 2006 of the futures contracts of corn, feeder and live cattle to construct the daily cattle crush spread for two different combinations of futures contracts traded in the Chicago Board of Trade and Chicago Mercantile Exchange. These contract combinations suppose that cattle are fed in feedlots for 170 days before being marketed in April and in October. Two different scenarios are also evaluated using the cattle crush spread: one in which the crush is employed as a pre-placement hedging tool and another in which the crush is used as a post-placement hedging method.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 154
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A REEXAMINATION OF HELMUTH TRADING STRATEGY FOR LIVE CATTLE FUTURES
    ELAM, E
    WAYOOPAGTR, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1991, 73 (05) : 1532 - 1532
  • [2] Gross Margin Hedging Opportunities for Stocker Cattle Producers in the Western US
    Koontz, Stephen R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 33 (03) : 492 - 492
  • [3] Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity
    Brennan, Marnie L.
    Christley, Robert M.
    [J]. BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2013, 9
  • [4] Cattle producers’ perceptions of biosecurity
    Marnie L Brennan
    Robert M Christley
    [J]. BMC Veterinary Research, 9
  • [5] Bioenergy for Cattle and Cars: A Switchgrass Production System that Engages Cattle Producers
    Mosali, Jagadeesh
    Biermacher, Jon T.
    Cook, Billy
    Blanton, John, Jr.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2013, 105 (04) : 960 - 966
  • [6] FEEDER CATTLE FUTURES - AN ANALYSIS OF A MARKETING ALTERNATIVE FOR FEEDER CATTLE PRODUCERS
    JENKINS, DA
    CARVER, RD
    MENKHAUS, DJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 68 (05) : 1373 - 1373
  • [7] MARKETING CHOICES OF ALABAMA CATTLE PRODUCERS
    TRAVNICHEK, R
    PREVATT, JW
    MARTIN, NR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 75 (05) : 1320 - 1320
  • [8] PROFITABLE HEDGING OPPORTUNITIES AND RISK PREMIUMS FOR PRODUCERS IN LIVE CATTLE AND LIVE HOG FUTURES MARKETS
    HAYENGA, ML
    DIPIETRE, DD
    SKADBERG, JM
    SCHROEDER, TC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1983, 65 (05) : 1191 - 1191
  • [9] Computer use by Tennessee cattle producers.
    Neel, J. B.
    Fisher, A. E.
    Lane, C. D.
    Gill, W. W.
    Kirkpatrick, F. D.
    Rhea, A. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 : 42 - 43
  • [10] CATTLE TOWNS - SOCIAL HISTORY OF KANSAS CATTLE TRADING CENTRES - DYKSTRA,RR
    BURCHELL, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN STUDIES, 1971, 4 (02) : 259 - 264