THE INCIDENCE OF GENITAL PROLAPSE AFTER THE BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION

被引:146
|
作者
WISKIND, AK [1 ]
CREIGHTON, SM [1 ]
STANTON, SL [1 ]
机构
[1] ST GEORGE HOSP,SCH MED,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,URODYNAM UNIT,LONDON,ENGLAND
关键词
STRESS INCONTINENCE; PROLAPSE; BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91419-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the incidence of postoperative genital prolapse after the Burch colposuspension and to identify risk factors for the development of subsequent prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: The charts of 131 patients who had a Burch colposuspension performed by the senior author (S.L.S.) between 1977 and 1986 were reviewed at the Urodynamic Unit of St. George's Hospital, London. Emphasis was placed on the degree of genital prolapse on clinical examination and whether further surgery was required to correct the prolapse. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (26.7%) required a total of 40 operations to correct genital prolapse after colposuspension. At 20 operations, more than one procedure was required to correct combined prolapse. The patient's age, weight, parity, menopausal status, and prior pelvic surgery did not affect the incidence of postoperative prolapse. The only preoperative risk factor identified was the presence of a large cystocele. CONCLUSION: Postoperative genital prolapse is a significant complication of the Burch colposuspension. It is unclear whether this is due to a disruption of the vaginal axis or to an intrinsic weakness of the pelvic floor in these women.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of genital prolapse after Burch colposuspension
    Kjolhede, P
    Noren, B
    Ryden, G
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 75 (09) : 849 - 854
  • [2] Genital prolapse in women treated successfully and unsuccessfully by the Burch colposuspension
    Kjolhede, P
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 77 (04) : 444 - 450
  • [3] Prevention of genital prolapse following Burch colposuspension: comparison between two surgical procedures
    R. Langer
    Y. Lipshitz
    R. Halperin
    M. Pansky
    I. Bukovsky
    D. Sherman
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2003, 14 : 13 - 16
  • [4] Prevention of genital prolapse following Burch colposuspension: comparison between two surgical procedures
    Langer, R
    Lipshitz, Y
    Halperin, R
    Pansky, M
    Bukovsky, I
    Sherman, D
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2003, 14 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [5] Abdominal hysterectomy and Burch colposuspension for uterovaginal prolapse
    H. S. Cronjé
    J. A. A. de Beer
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2004, 15 : 257 - 260
  • [6] Abdominal hysterectomy and Burch colposuspension for uterovaginal prolapse
    Cronjé, HS
    de Beer, JAA
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2004, 15 (04) : 257 - 260
  • [7] Burch Colposuspension
    Sohlberg, Ericka M.
    Elliott, Christopher S.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 46 (01) : 53 - +
  • [8] Burch colposuspension
    Veit-Rubin, Nikolaus
    Dubuisson, Jean
    Ford, Abigail
    Dubuisson, Jean-Bernard
    Mourad, Sherif
    Digesu, Alex
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 (02) : 553 - 562
  • [9] Sacral colpopexy with concurrent Burch colposuspension in patients with vaginal vault prolapse
    Wille, S
    Braun, M
    Heidenreich, A
    Hofmann, R
    Engelmann, U
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2006, 76 (04) : 339 - 344
  • [10] DENOVO DETRUSOR INSTABILITY AFTER BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION
    VIERHOUT, ME
    MULDER, AFP
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 71 (06) : 414 - 416