A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Cheng, Hang [1 ]
Clymer, Jeffrey W. [1 ]
Ferko, Nicole C. [2 ]
Patel, Leena [2 ]
Soleas, Ireena M. [2 ]
Cameron, Chris G. [2 ]
Hinoul, Piet [1 ]
机构
[1] Ethicon Inc, 4545 Creek Rd, Cincinnati, OH 45242 USA
[2] Cornerstone Res Grp, Burlington, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
dissection; complications; ultrasonic;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S110461
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, the meta-analysis did not include studies of BCS patients and focused on a subset of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to compare Harmonic technology and conventional techniques for a range of clinical outcomes and complications in both mastectomy and BCS patients, including axillary lymph node dissection. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials comparing Harmonic technology and conventional methods in breast cancer surgery. Outcome measures included blood loss, drainage volume, total complications, seroma, necrosis, wound infections, ecchymosis, hematoma, hospital length of stay, and operating time. Risk of bias was analyzed for all studies. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models for mean differences of continuous variables and a fixed-effects model for risk ratios of dichotomous variables. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Across surgery types, compared to conventional techniques, Harmonic technology reduced total complications by 52% (P=0.002), seroma by 46% (P<0.0001), necrosis by 49% (P=0.04), postoperative chest wall drainage by 46% (P=0.0005), blood loss by 38% (P=0.0005), and length of stay by 22% (P=0.007). Although benefits generally appeared greatest in mastectomy patients with lymph node dissection, Harmonic technology showed significant reductions in complications in the BCS study subgroup. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of both mastectomy and BCS procedures, the use of Harmonic technology reduced the risk of most complications by about half across breast cancer surgery patients. These benefits may be due to superior hemostatic capabilities of Harmonic technology and better dissection, particularly lymph node dissection. Reduction in complications and other resource outcomes may engender lower downstream health care costs.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 140
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review and meta-analysis of repeat breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for the management of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence
    Tollan, Clare Josephine
    Pantiora, Eirini
    Karakatsanis, Andreas
    Tasoulis, Marios Konstantinos
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 175 - 175
  • [2] Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 studies
    Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Y.
    Zaman, Shafquat
    Zafar, Shaista
    Laroiya, Ishita
    Iqbal, Javeria
    Tan, Melissa Ley Hui
    Shetty, Geeta
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2022, 42
  • [3] Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery Versus Salvage Mastectomy for Ipsilateral Breast Tumour Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
    Mo, Caiqin
    Ruan, Weihong
    Lin, Junyu
    Chen, Huaying
    Chen, Xiangjin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [4] Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadaf Zehra
    F. Doyle
    M. Barry
    S. Walsh
    M. R. Kell
    [J]. Breast Cancer, 2020, 27 : 534 - 566
  • [5] Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zehra, Sadaf
    Doyle, F.
    Barry, M.
    Walsh, S.
    Kell, M. R.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER, 2020, 27 (04) : 534 - 566
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: An updated meta-analysis
    Tian, Rui
    Zheng, Yu
    Liu, Ruikang
    Jiang, Chen
    Zheng, Hongmei
    [J]. BREAST, 2024, 77
  • [7] Comparison of endoscopic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Li, Liwen
    Liang, Yiwen
    Li, Chunyan
    Huang, Miaoyan
    Liang, Weiming
    Qin, Tian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [8] Breast Conserving Surgery Compared With Mastectomy in Male Breast Cancer: A Brief Systematic Review
    Sauder, Candice A. M.
    Bateni, Sarah B.
    Davidson, Anders J.
    Nishijima, Daniel K.
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2020, 20 (03) : E309 - E314
  • [9] Comparison of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Breast-Conserving Surgery Alone: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Jun-Ying
    Huang, Yi-Jie
    Zhang, Liu-Lu
    Yang, Ci-Qiu
    Wang, Kun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (03) : 321 - +
  • [10] Neuropathic Pain Following Breast-conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kwee, Esmee
    de Groot, Lucas G.
    Alonso, Paula Rijs
    Krikour, Keghart
    Duraku, Liron S.
    Hundepool, Caroline A.
    Zuidam, J. Michiel
    [J]. JPRAS OPEN, 2024, 42 : 48 - 57