Improving river health: insights into initiating collaboration in a transboundary river basin

被引:4
|
作者
Plummer, Ryan [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Julia [1 ]
Krievins, Katrina [1 ]
Mitchell, Simon J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Environm Sustainabil Res Ctr, 500 Glenridge Ave, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[2] Univ Stockholm, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] eWorld Wildlife Fund Canada, Nackawic, NB, Canada
关键词
Collaboration; collaborative management; collaborative governance; social-ecological inventory; transboundary rivers;
D O I
10.1080/15715124.2015.1080717
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
River health is a concern worldwide. Governance of river basins is particularly complicated when they are large scale and cross jurisdictional boundaries. Past approaches to making decisions in transboundary basins are limited and attention is increasingly being focused on the potential of collaboration. This research investigates the initiation phase of a collaborative conservation project (WWF-Canada Freshwater Program, St. John River project) in the St. John River Basin of Canada. A social-ecological inventory technique and social network analysis are used to identify the actors in the transboundary basin and their activities, perceptions and connections to river health, relationship with other stakeholders, and actual engagement with a milestone event in the project. Insights gained from exploring the relationships between/among these variables highlight the complicated nature of initiating collaboration. A common understanding of river health and a strong structure of connected actors were encouraging signs that collaboration may flourish, while the assertion of power and context surrounding the initiative were found to mediate its possibility. The collaborative potential of conservation projects in large-scale transboundary river basins may be enhanced through such research and by actively applying these insights.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 132
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving transboundary river basin management by integrating environmental flow considerations
    Krchnak, Karin M.
    [J]. TRANSBOUNDARY WATER RESOURCES: A FOUNDATION FOR REGIONAL STABILITY IN CENTRAL ASIA, 2008, : 223 - 241
  • [2] Governing for local livelihoods in transboundary river systems: insights from the Cubango-Okavango River Basin
    Shinn, Jamie E.
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2024, 24 (03)
  • [3] SUCCESSFUL TRANSBOUNDARY RIVER BASIN AND ESTUARY COOPERATION: BENCHMARKS FOR THE URAL RIVER BASIN?
    Simpson, Jerome
    Stec, Stephen
    Cofino, Wim
    Peeters, Helle
    Van Hove, Bert
    Verhallen, Annemiek
    [J]. RESCUE OF STURGEON SPECIES IN THE URAL RIVER BASIN, 2008, : 39 - +
  • [4] The Ecologo-Hydrological Problems of the Transboundary Basin of the Ural River, and the Prospects for Institutional Collaboration
    Sivokhip, Zh. T.
    Chibilev, A. A.
    [J]. GEOGRAPHY AND NATURAL RESOURCES, 2014, 35 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [5] Water assessment in transboundary river basins: the case of the Medjerda River Basin
    Rajosoa, Andrianirina Sedera
    Abdelbaki, Cherifa
    Mourad, Khaldoon A.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 7 (06)
  • [6] Water assessment in transboundary river basins: the case of the Medjerda River Basin
    Andrianirina Sedera Rajosoa
    Chérifa Abdelbaki
    Khaldoon A. Mourad
    [J]. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 2021, 7
  • [7] Transboundary water problems in the basin of the Irtysh River
    Vinokurov, YI
    Zherelina, IV
    Zanosova, VI
    [J]. Transboundary Water Resources: Strategies for Regional Security and Ecological Stability, 2005, 46 : 83 - 91
  • [8] Aras transboundary river basin cooperation perspective
    Heidari, A.
    [J]. DAMS AND RESERVOIRS UNDER CHANGING CHALLENGES, 2011, : 429 - 436
  • [9] Water Use in the Transboundary Basin of the Amur River
    Gorbatenko, L. V.
    [J]. GEOGRAPHY AND NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 37 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [10] Managing the largest transboundary river basin in the world: the Amazon basin
    Braga, Benedito P. F.
    [J]. WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 32 (02) : 339 - 341