Partisan Politics and Dynamics in the U.S. Agriculture Protection

被引:0
|
作者
Park, Jong Hee [1 ]
Jensen, Nathan M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Int Relat, Seoul, South Korea
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Business, Int Business, Washington, DC 20052 USA
来源
关键词
partisan politics; agriculture; trade protection; gridlock; U.S; Congress;
D O I
10.14731/kjis.2014.06.12.1.225
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Agriculture policy is an important, albeit contentious, political economic issue that has been at the center of trade wars, legal disputes, and a stalling of the current World Trade Organization (WTO) trade round. Unlike trade negotiations in non-agricultural industries, advanced agriculture producers such as members of the European Union and the United States are quite reluctant to liberalize their agriculture sectors. In this articlewe explain the dynamics of agricultural protection in the United States by focusing on the role of partisan politics. We argue that major shifts in the size of U.S. farm support benefits have been shaped by partisan battles over the food stamp program ever since this program's inclusion in the 1971 farm bill. While Democratic Congresses try to increase the size of the food stamp program, Republican Congresses try to shrink it. In the case of divided government, these partisan interventions generate a trade-off between changes in the size of the food stamp program and changes in the size of farm support benefits. This trade-off becomes necessary due to spending constraints and institutional gridlock. We provide empirical evidence in support of this claim from county-level data on farm payments and food stamp benefits and aggregate changes in both programs between 1973 and 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 254
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transforming U.S. Agriculture
    Reganold, J. P.
    Jackson-Smith, D.
    Batie, S. S.
    Harwood, R. R.
    Kornegay, J. L.
    Bucks, D.
    Flora, C. B.
    Hanson, J. C.
    Jury, W. A.
    Meyer, D.
    Schumacher, A., Jr.
    Sehmsdorf, H.
    Shennan, C.
    Thrupp, L. A.
    Willis, P.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6030) : 670 - 671
  • [2] NAFTA AND U.S. AGRICULTURE
    BRENNER, KD
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1993, 101 (07) : 565 - 565
  • [3] Exploring the Regional Dynamics of U.S. Irrigated Agriculture from 2002 to 2017
    Shrestha, Dinesh
    Brown, Jesslyn F.
    Benedict, Trenton D.
    Howard, Daniel M.
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [4] ELECTORAL DISTRICTS IN THE U.S.: GERRYMANDERING AS AN ASPECT OF PARTISAN COMPETITION
    Bunina, Anastasia A.
    [J]. MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2020, 64 (10): : 52 - 63
  • [5] Natural Disasters, ‘Partisan Retrospection,’ and U.S. Presidential Elections
    Boris Heersink
    Jeffery A. Jenkins
    Michael P. Olson
    Brenton D. Peterson
    [J]. Political Behavior, 2022, 44 : 1225 - 1246
  • [6] Malaria Protection for U.S. Travelers
    Williams, Valerie
    [J]. US PHARMACIST, 2023, 48 (12) : 38 - 43
  • [7] The South and the Transformation of U.S. Politics
    Grant, Keneshia N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY, 2021, 87 (01) : 154 - 155
  • [8] Identity and partisan reception in U.S. debates about gun violence
    Rood, Craig
    [J]. COMMUNICATION TEACHER, 2020, 34 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [9] Partisan styles of self-presentation in U.S. Twitter bios
    Liam Essig
    Daniel DellaPosta
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 14
  • [10] A Note on the Use of Conservation Practices in U.S. Agriculture
    Roy Boyd
    Noel D. Uri
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2001, 72 : 141 - 178