Comparing Sentencing Decision Support Systems for Judges and Lawyers

被引：3

作者：

Schild, Uri J. ^{[1
]}

Zeleznikow, John ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Comp Sci, IL-52900 Ramat Gan, Israel

[2] Victoria Univ, Sch Informat Syst, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia

来源：

JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS | 2008年 / 17卷 / 04期

关键词：

Decision Support; Discretionary Reasoning; Criminal Sentencing;

D O I：

10.3166/JDS.17.523-552

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];

学科分类号：

070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;

摘要：

Decision Support Systems have been widely used in business and engineering applications. Because sentencing is primarily concerned with consistency of process rather than consistency of outcome, it has not been a fruitful area for decision support research. We give an outline of the need for decision support to support sentencing decision-making. We examine current sentencing decision support systems and compare their different aims and users.

引用

页码：523 / 552

页数：30

共 50 条

[1] Decision Support Systems for Trial Lawyers
Chalamish, Michal
Galili, Eran
Schild, Uri J.
[J]. FUSING DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS INTO THE FABRIC OF THE CONTEXT, 2012, 238 : 435 - +
[2] Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications
Watamura, Eiichiro
Ioku, Tomohiro
[J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (11):
[3] Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Sentencing: Comparing the Views of Judges and Jurors
Warner, Kate
Davis, Julia
Freiberg, Arie
Spiranovic, Caroline
Cockburn, Helen
[J]. AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2018, 92 (05): : 374 - 391
[4] OF LAWYERS AND JUDGES
STEWART, DO
NELSON, S
[J]. ABA JOURNAL, 1988, 74 : 46 - &
[5] Comparing diagnostic decision support systems for pneumonia
Lagor, C
Aronsky, D
Fiszman, M
Haug, PJ
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2000, : 1057 - 1057
[6] Criminal sentencing, intuition and decision support
Vincent, Andrew
Sourdin, Tania
Zeleznikow, John
[J]. ADVANCES AND INNOVATIONS IN SYSTEMS, COMPUTING SCIENCES AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2007, : 41 - +
[7] Criminal Sentencing and Intelligent Decision Support
[J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1998, 6 (2-4) : 151 - 202
[8] SENTENCING - THE JUDGES PROBLEM
KAUFMAN, IR
[J]. FEDERAL PROBATION, 1960, 24 (01) : 3 - 10
[9] A map of sentencing and a compass for judges: Sentencing information systems, transparency, and the next generation of reform
Miller, ML
[J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 2005, 105 (04) : 1351 - 1395
[10] Aggravating or Mitigating? Comparing Judges' and Jurors' Views on Four Ambiguous Sentencing Factors
Warner, Kate
Spiranovic, Caroline
Freiberg, Arie
Davis, Julia
Bartels, Lorana
[J]. JOURNAL OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 28 (01): : 51 - 66

← 1 2 3 4 5 →