CHEMICAL WEED-CONTROL IN SWEET CHERRY PEPPERS

被引:0
|
作者
ORENGO, E
LIU, LC
ACIN, N
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Two herbicide experiments with sweet cherry peppers were conducted in a Fraternidad clay at Lajas Substation from 1989 to 1990. In the first experiment, clomazone at 1.68 and 3.36 kg ai/ha applied pre-plant and incorporated, as well as fluazifop at 0.42 and 0.84 applied postemergence, gave excellent control of most grasses. Oxyfluorfen at 0.20 kg ai/ha as a pre-plant followed by bentazon at 1.12 kg ai/ha and fluazifop at 0.42 kg ai/ha also provided excellent weed control. The highest sweet cherry pepper yield was obtained with the hand-weeded control. It was then followed by oxyfluorfen at 0.20 kg ai/ha, then followed by bentazon + fluazifop mixture. The treatment with fluazifop at 0.42 kg ai/ha as a postemergence + one supplementary handweeding ranked third in yield. The above treatments did not differ significantly in yield. In the second experiment, colmazone at 2.24 kg ai/ha as a pre-plant, followed by three post directed application of paraquat at 0.56 kg ai/ha, gave the best weed control. Oxyfluorfen at 0.56 kg ai/ha as a pre-plant followed by bentazon at 1.12 kg ai/ha and fluazifop at 0.42 kg ai/ha mixture, also gave excellent weed control. The highest cherry pepper yield was obtained with clomazone at 2.24 kg ai/ha plus three applications of paraquat at 0.56kg ai/ha. This yield was followed by that with oxyfluorfen at 0.56 kg ai/ha followed by bentazone and fluazifop mixture. Napropamide at 2.24 kg ai/ha as a pre-plant, followed by three post directed applications of paraquat at 0.56 kg ai/ha, was ranked third. A good yield was also obtained with Napropamide at 2.24 kg ai/ha as a pre-plant followed by bentazon at 2.24 kg ai/ha and fluazifop at 0.42 kg ai/ha mixture. Yields did not differ significantly with these treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 268
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WEED-CONTROL TRIALS IN SWEET CHERRY PEPPERS IN 1991 AND 1992
    ORENGOSANTIAGO, E
    LIU, LC
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO, 1994, 78 (1-2): : 45 - 50
  • [2] EFFECTS OF COMBINATIONS OF WEED-CONTROL METHODS AND PLANT SPACINGS ON THE YIELD OF SWEET PEPPERS
    PORTER, WC
    ETZEL, WW
    HORTSCIENCE, 1981, 16 (03) : 286 - 286
  • [3] WEED-CONTROL IN SWEET POTATOES
    HAMMETT, HL
    HERNANDEZ, TP
    LOUISIANA AGRICULTURE, 1978, 21 (02): : 8 - &
  • [4] CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL IN PEPPERS
    WHITING, FL
    LIPPERT, LF
    LYONS, JM
    CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, 1970, 24 (07) : 8 - &
  • [5] CHEMICAL WEED-CONTROL IN TREES
    MITICH, LW
    NORTH DAKOTA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE CIRCULAR, 1979, (NW-41): : 1 - 4
  • [6] CHEMICAL WEED-CONTROL IN VINEYARDS
    MULLINS, CA
    LOCKWOOD, DW
    COFFEY, DL
    TENNESSEE FARM & HOME SCIENCE, 1978, (108): : 16 - 17
  • [7] CHEMICAL WEED-CONTROL IN FORESTS
    OLBERGKALLFASS, R
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 1977, 84 (09): : 559 - 572
  • [8] CHEMICAL WEED-CONTROL IN LUPINS
    CUTHBERTSON, EG
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1976, 16 (80): : 394 - 401
  • [9] CHEMICAL WEED-CONTROL IN PUMPKIN
    LIU, LC
    CARABALLO, E
    REYESSOTO, I
    ACIN, N
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO, 1992, 76 (02): : 55 - 61
  • [10] CHEMICAL WEED-CONTROL IN SESAME
    GAUR, BL
    TOMAR, DS
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1978, 23 (01) : 71 - 71