FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 804(B) (3) AND INCULPATORY STATEMENTS AGAINST PENAL INTEREST

被引：3

|

作者：

BERGEISEN, MD

机构：

来源：

CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW | 1978年 / 66卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/3479936

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：1189 / 1217

页数：29

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] INCULPATORY STATEMENTS AGAINST PENAL INTEREST AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE
KELLER, AR
[J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1983, 83 (01) : 159 - 185
[2] INCULPATORY DECLARATIONS AGAINST PENAL INTEREST AND THE CO-CONSPIRATOR RULE UNDER THE FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE
FRYE, DM
[J]. INDIANA LAW JOURNAL, 1980, 56 (01) : 151 - 173
[3] Facially Exculpatory Yet Inherently Incriminating: Why Affirmative Defense Statements Should Qualify as Statements Against Penal Interest Under Rule 804(b)(3)
Pellegrino, Timothy M.
[J]. GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL, 2019, 108 (01) : 203 - 224
[4] MILITARY-RULE OF EVIDENCE 804(B)(3)'S STATEMENT AGAINST PENAL INTEREST EXCEPTION - CAN THE RULE STAND ON ITS OWN
SHARP, ME
[J]. MILITARY LAW REVIEW, 1990, 130 : 77 - 133
[5] THE WILLIAMSON STANDARD FOR THE EXCEPTION TO THE RULE AGAINST HEARSAY FOR STATEMENTS AGAINST PENAL INTEREST
DUCK, EF
[J]. JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 1995, 85 (04): : 1084 - 1113
[6] ADMISSIBILITY OF STATEMENTS AGAINST PENAL INTEREST
不详
[J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1926, 36 (01): : 119 - 123
[7] EVIDENCE - DECLARATIONS AGAINST PENAL INTEREST AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Carroll, Lewis C.
[J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1926, 13 (01) : 41 - 48
[8] PERILS OF THE RULEMAKING PROCESS - THE DEVELOPMENT, APPLICATION, AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RULE 804(B)(3)S PENAL INTEREST EXCEPTION
TAGUE, PW
[J]. GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL, 1981, 69 (04) : 851 - 1013
[9] THE ADMISSIBILITY OF INCULPATORY STATEMENTS IN WASHINGTON UNDER THE RULE FOR DECLARATIONS AGAINST INTEREST AFTER WILLAMSON V UNITED-STATES
GORTNER, J
[J]. WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1995, 70 (03) : 859 - 881
[10] A CASE FOR THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE INCULPATORY DECLARATION AGAINST PENAL INTEREST - OVERCOMING JUDICIAL RELUCTANCE TO CHANGE
BROWN, DA
[J]. MILITARY LAW REVIEW, 1984, 105 : 97 - 123

← 1 2 3 4 5 →