FUNDING MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE: EU EXPERIENCE

被引:0
|
作者
Kniaz, S. [1 ,2 ]
Pavlenko, E. [3 ]
Rubel, O. [4 ,5 ]
Zavnerchik, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Lviv Polytech, Econ Sci, Lvov, Ukraine
[2] Natl Univ Lviv Polytech, Dept Entrepreneurship & Environm Inspect Goods, Lvov, Ukraine
[3] Odessa State Environm Univ, Odessa, Ukraine
[4] NAS, Inst Market Problems & Econ Ecol Res, Econ Sci, Kiev, Ukraine
[5] NAS, Inst Market Problems & Econ Ecol Res, Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
marine strategy; funding mechanisms; implementation; directive; institutional background;
D O I
10.18371/fcaptp.v4i27.154215
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Over the past decade, there have been signs of improvement of the Black Sea. However, its unique water areas and coastline are still under serious threat. The Black Sea is unprotected from significant anthropogenic pressures, and has a low adaptive potential. If as the region's economy grows, these pressures will intensify, the problem will become more serious. The implementation of the Directive 2008/56/EC establishing a framework for Community action in the field of environmental policy on the marine environment (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) are important for Ukraine. The use of the marine environment, taking into account the ecosystem approach and the principle of integrated management improves the environment, biodiversity, development of industries marine complex, especially commercial fish and shellfish, recreation and tourism. Directive 2008/56/EC aims to achieve good environmental status of marine waters and to protect the marine resources that affect the economic and social activities. The main stages of the implementation of Directive 2008/56/EC include: 1) adoption of national legislation and designation the authority or authorities competent for the implementation of this Directive; 2) initial assessment of the current environmental status of marine waters; determine good environmental status for marine waters and establishment environmental targets and associated indicators; establishment of monitoring program for the development of ongoing assessment and regular updating purposes; 3) development programme of measures to achieve good environmental status. Implementation of the MSFD requires more coordinated research, so that studies to evaluate benefits can be carried out across countries using comparable, state-of-the-art valuation methods. This could also include the combination of different valuation methods, e.g. of stated and revealed preference methods, to gain more reliable benefit estimates. Moreover, integrated modelling will be of utmost importance to link bio-geophysical and socio-economic systems and to trace the effects of changes in the marine environment to their impact on benefits. Focus is on methodological questions related to a common understanding of the funding, technical and scientific implications of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. In particular, one of the objectives of the strategy is the development of non-legally binding and practical documents, such as co-financing of MSFD measures.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 348
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPLEMENTATION OF MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IN ROMANIA
    Boicenco, L.
    Buga, L.
    Zaharia, T.
    Nicolaev, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2018, 19 (01): : 196 - 207
  • [2] On the environmental effectiveness of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Bertram, Christine
    Rehdanz, Katrin
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2013, 38 : 25 - 40
  • [3] Legal Implementation of Integrated Ocean Policies: The EU's Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Markus, Till
    Schlacke, Sabine
    Maier, Nina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW, 2011, 26 (01): : 59 - 90
  • [4] Surveillance indicators and their use in implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Shephard, Samuel
    Greenstreet, Simon P. R.
    Piet, GerJan J.
    Rindorf, Anna
    Dickey-Collas, Mark
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2015, 72 (08) : 2269 - 2277
  • [5] Valuing the non-market benefits arising from the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Norton, Daniel
    Hynes, Stephen
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 10 : 84 - 96
  • [6] Uses of Innovative Modeling Tools within the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Lynam, Christopher P.
    Uusitalo, Laura
    Patricio, Joana
    Piroddi, Chiara
    Queiros, Ana M.
    Teixeira, Heliana
    Rossberg, Axel G.
    Sagarminaga, Yolanda
    Hyder, Kieran
    Niquil, Nathalie
    Moellmann, Christian
    Wilson, Christian
    Chust, Guillem
    Galparsoro, Ibon
    Forster, Rodney
    Verissimo, Helena
    Tedesco, Letizia
    Revilla, Marta
    Neville, Suzanna
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2016, 3
  • [7] Microplastics in Seawater: Recommendations from the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Implementation Process
    Gago, Jesus
    Galgani, Francois
    Maes, Thomas
    Thompson, Richard C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2016, 3
  • [8] Implementation of The EU Water Framework Directive in Latvia
    Springe, G
    [J]. International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology, Vol 29, Pt 1, Proceedings, 2005, 29 : 382 - 383
  • [9] A clear delimitation of coastal waters facing the EU environmental legislation: from the Water Framework Directive to the Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Liquete, Camino
    Somma, Francesca
    Maes, Joachim
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (04) : 432 - 444
  • [10] Implementation of EU Water Framework Directive in Turkey
    Moroglu, M.
    Yazgan, M. S.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2008, 226 (1-3) : 271 - 278