SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS IN THE VALLEY OF MEXICO - SELECTION OF INPUT MOTION AND EXTENT OF NONLINEAR SOIL BEHAVIOR

被引:12
|
作者
ORDAZ, M [1 ]
FACCIOLI, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, NATL CTR DISASTER PREVENT, COYOACAN 04510, DF, MEXICO
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1002/eqe.4290230806
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
It is well known that seismic waves in the lake-bed zone of Mexico city are dramatically amplified, and that the soft clays in this region exhibit an unusually large elastic range. New field and laboratory data show that clays in certain areas within the Valley of Mexico have lower elastic thresholds and, hence, non-linear soil behaviour would be more likely to take place. In this paper, we analyse geotechnical and strong-motion data to model, using a one-dimensional (1-D) approach, the non-linear soil response at two sites in Mexico City during the September 19,1985 (M(s) = 8.1) Michoacan earthquake. Results suggest that, even for motions as large as those recorded during the 1985 Michoacan event, a linear viscoelastic behaviour must be assumed for the examined area, although, as far as it is presently known, the clays from this area show the greatest modulus reduction among the Mexico City clays. Thus, a linear 1-D propagation analysis continues to be a suitable engineering option in computing expected ground motions at soft sites for the Valley of Mexico. Caution, however, is warranted when selecting input motions, since, as shown in this paper, large differences can result depending on the choice of outcrop motions.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 908
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity of Site Response Analyses to Input Motion Selection Protocols
    Kaklamanos, James
    Chowdhury, Ishika N.
    Cabas, Ashly
    Kottke, Albert R.
    Gregor, Nick
    [J]. GEO-EXTREME 2021: CLIMATIC EXTREMES AND EARTHQUAKE MODELING, 2021, 329 : 367 - 378
  • [2] Effect of Soil Properties and Input Motion on Site Amplification Using Validated Nonlinear Soil Model
    Shrestha, Samyog
    Kurt, Efe G.
    Kim, Kyungtae
    Prakash, Arun
    Irfanoglu, Ayhan
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 207 (11) : 1639 - 1663
  • [3] Influence of Input Motion and Site Property Variabilities on Seismic Site Response Analysis
    Rathje, Ellen M.
    Kottke, Albert R.
    Trent, Whitney L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 136 (04) : 607 - 619
  • [4] Ground motion analysis in nonlinear soil site with random media
    Chen, Yuan
    Li, Jie
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE INNOVATION, PTS 1-6, 2012, 368-373 : 920 - +
  • [5] Empirical Quantification of the Impact of Nonlinear Soil Behavior on Site Response
    Regnier, Julie
    Cadet, Heloise
    Bard, Pierre-Yves
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 106 (04) : 1710 - 1719
  • [6] Site effects and soil-structure interaction in the Valley of Mexico
    Aviles, J
    Perez-Rocha, LE
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 1998, 17 (01) : 29 - 39
  • [7] The Influence of Input Motion Scaling Strategies on Nonlinear Ground Response Analyses of Soft Soil Deposits
    Guzel, Yusuf
    Elia, Gaetano
    Rouainia, Mohamed
    Falcone, Gaetano
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [8] Site response analysis of vertical ground motion in consideration of soil nonlinearity
    Tsai, Chi-Chin
    Liu, Hsing-Wen
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 102 : 124 - 136
  • [9] Simplified BNWF model for nonlinear seismic response analysis of offshore piles with nonlinear input ground motion analysis
    Naggar, M
    Shayanfar, M
    Kimiaei, M
    Aghakouchak, A
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (02) : 365 - 380
  • [10] Implications of input ground-motion selection techniques on site response analyses for different tectonic settings
    Chowdhury, Ishika N.
    Cabas, Ashly
    Kaklamanos, James
    Kottke, Albert
    Gregor, Nick
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (02) : 1521 - 1551