INVOLVEMENT OF THE MACROPHAGE LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN RECEPTOR-BINDING DOMAINS IN THE UPTAKE OF OXIDIZED LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN

Macrophages, unlike most other cells, possess both low density lipoprotein (LDL) and scavenger receptors. The scavenger receptor has been shown to mediate the uptake of oxidized LDL (ox-LDL), which ultimately leads to cholesterol loading of the macrophages. The present study was undertaken to define epitopes on ox-LDL that are important for lipoprotein binding to macrophages and to ascertain whether ox-LDL can bind to the LDL receptor. Monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) directed against several epitopes along the apolipoprotein B-100 (apo B-100) molecule were used. LDL (300-mu-g/ml) was oxidized by incubation with 10-mu-M CuSO4 for 24 hours. Ox-LDL, as opposed to acetylated LDL (ac-LDL), reacted with Mabs directed against the LDL receptor-binding domains (Mabs B1B6 and B1B3. Similarly, uptake of ox-LDL but not ac-LDL by a murine J774 macrophage-like cell line was inhibited by as much as 40% after using Mab B1B6. The anti-LDL receptor antibody IgG-C7 also inhibited I-125-ox-LDL uptake by macrophages by 60%. Chromatography on heparin-Sepharose columns of LDL that was partially oxidized for only 3 hours resulted in two fractions: an unbound fraction with characteristics similar to those of ox-LDL and a bound fraction similar to native LDL. Macrophage degradation of the unbound fraction was inhibited by Mab IgG-C7 and Mab B1B6, which are directed toward the LDL receptor and the LDL receptor-binding domains on apo B-100, respectively. When incubated with three types of macrophages, J774 macrophage cells, mouse peritoneal macrophages, and human monocyte-derived macrophages, excess amounts of unlabeled ox-LDL, like native LDL but unlike ac-LDL, substantially suppressed the uptake and degradation of I-125-labeled LDL Similar studies with fibroblasts, however, revealed that unlabeled LDL but not unlabeled ox-LDL or ac-LDL competed with I-125-LDL for cellular uptake and degradation. Mab directed against epitopes on the amino terminus domain of apo B-100 (C14) demonstrates a similar immunoreactivity with ox-LDL and native LDL but a much lower reactivity with ac-LDL Mab C14 inhibited macrophage degradation of ox-LDL by 34% but had no inhibitory effect on the uptake of native LDL or ac-LDL. Thus, the ac-LDL and LDL receptor-binding domains as well as a unique epitope on the amino terminus of apo B-100 may be involved in macrophage binding of ox-LDL We conclude that 1) ox-LDL contains epitopes that are also present in native LDL, although considerable changes in these epitopes are suggested and 2) these epitopes are involved in the uptake of ox-LDL by macrophages.