A case for sui generis treatment of software under the WTO regime

被引:3
|
作者
Marsoof, Althaf [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Bentley, WA, Australia
[2] Inst European Studies, Macau, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[4] Attorney Gen Dept Sri Lanka, Dept Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ijlit/eas016
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Is software a 'good' or 'service'? Deriving an answer is no easy task. Given the volume of trade in software, the prominence software has gained in international trade and the advent of the Internet and electronic commerce, answering this question is of paramount importance. In particular, the absence of a definition of 'goods' in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the existence of a deficient definition of 'services' in the General Agreement on Trade in Services has resulted in Members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) adopting varying approaches in classifying software. While this article focuses on the importance and consequence of software classification in the context of the WTO, upon an examination of the different approaches adopted by legal systems across the globe it also considers whether maintaining a goods-services dichotomy in software products is necessary. Given the unique and complex nature of software, it will be argued that sui generis treatment of software is the most appropriate solution to minimize the consequences of the differential treatment of software in the context of the WTO.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 311
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scientific, databases should be protected under a sui generis regime
    Pachnanda, A
    BUFFALO LAW REVIEW, 2003, 51 (01): : 219 - 250
  • [2] SUI-GENERIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE
    PHILLIPS, JC
    GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1992, 60 (04) : 997 - 1041
  • [3] Europeanisation Meets Turkey. A Case Sui Generis?
    Borzel, Tanja A.
    TURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: PROCESSES OF EUROPEANISATION, 2012, : 9 - 21
  • [4] Sui generis head trauma: A case with intracerebral phalanges
    Luque, Juan Carlos
    Luque, Jorge Enrique
    Monsalve, Guillermo Alfonso
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2007, 172 (08) : 899 - 901
  • [5] Sui Generis IPR Laws vis-a-vis Farmers' Rights in Some Asian Countries: Implications under the WTO
    Singh, Anshu Pratap
    Manchikanti, Padmavati
    Chawla, H. S.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 2011, 16 (02): : 107 - 116
  • [6] A Relook at Sui Generis Software Protection Through the Prism of Multi-Licensing
    Vasudeva, Vikrant Narayan
    JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 2013, 16 (1-2): : 87 - 103
  • [7] Sui generis: gene therapy and delivery systems for the treatment of glioblastoma
    Kane, J. Robert
    Miska, Jason
    Young, Jacob S.
    Kanojia, Deepak
    Kim, Julius W.
    Lesniak, Maciej S.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 17 : II24 - II36
  • [8] INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE AND CULTURE IN AUSTRALIA - THE CASE FOR SUI GENERIS LEGISLATION
    Stoianoff, Natalie
    Roy, Alpana
    MONASH UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2015, 41 (03): : 745 - 784
  • [9] Regionalism and liberal nationalism in the European Union. A case Sui Generis?
    Boerzel, Tanja A.
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 31 (10) : 3421 - 3442
  • [10] On the sui generis value capture of new digital technologies: The case of AI
    Kazim, Emre
    Fenoglio, Enzo
    Hilliard, Airlie
    Koshiyama, Adriano
    Mulligan, Catherine
    Trengove, Markus
    Gilbert, Abigail
    Gwagwa, Arthur
    Almeida, Denise
    Godsiff, Phil
    Porayska-Pomsta, Kaska
    PATTERNS, 2022, 3 (07):