Requirement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in head-and-neck cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy: An analysis of clinical and anatomic factors

被引:1
|
作者
Zauls, A. Jason [1 ]
Watkins, John M. [2 ]
Lucas, John [3 ]
Shirai, Keisuke [4 ]
Sharma, Anand K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Southcoast Canc Ctr, 363 Highland Ave, Fall River, MA 02720 USA
[2] Bismarck Canc Ctr, Bismarck, ND USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Radiat Oncol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2012.06.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: There is significant variation in recommendation for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LAHNC), with some clinicians globally recommending prophylactic PEG and others waiting until toxicity has occurred. The present study was conceived to identify specific factors associated with PEG requirement, in a population of LAHNC patients who did not have up-front PEG placement. Methods and Materials: Using a quality assurance database, we identified patients with oropharyngeal (ORP) or laryngeal-hypopharyngeal (LHP) LAHNC who were treated with CRT for inclusion in a cohort study of factors impacting PEG placement. Eligibility included stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of ORP and LHP. Patients were excluded if they had a PEG placement prior to commencement of CRT. The primary endpoint compared across groups was PEG placement, and multivariate analysis of factors was performed. Results: We identified 107 patients with LAHNC who did not receive PEG tubes prior to treatment. After treatment initiation, 41% of patients with ORP tumors required PEG placement during treatment compared with 16% of LHP patients (P = .03). After adjusting for covariates, multivariate analysis revealed that the only predictor for PEG placement was ORP primary (odds ratio 4.77; 95% confidence interval 1.6-13.8, P =.009) using LHP as reference. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the patients with ORP cancers are more likely to require PEG placement during treatment and should be considered for prophylactic PEG placement, while LHP sites were associated with lower likelihood of PEG requirement. The primary reason for this difference appears to be severity of pharyngitis; proactive nutritional monitoring and supplementation should be implemented early. Patients with pretreatment risk stratification for PEG placement in LAHNC may improve quality of care and avoid unnecessary treatment breaks. (C) 2013 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E61 / E69
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPACT OF EARLY PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS AND HOSPITALIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK CANCER RECEIVING DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIATION THERAPY
    Rutter, Charles E.
    Yovino, Susannah
    Taylor, Rodney
    Wolf, Jeffrey
    Cullen, Kevin J.
    Ord, Robert
    Athas, Mindy
    Zimrin, Ann
    Strome, Scott
    Suntharalingam, Mohan
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2011, 33 (10): : 1441 - 1447
  • [2] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in veterans treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck cancer.
    Mariash, Evan Michael
    Klein, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [3] Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy
    Lang, Kristin
    ElShafie, Rami A.
    Akbaba, Sati
    Koschny, Ronald
    Bougatf, Nina
    Bernhardt, Denise
    Welte, Stefan E.
    Adeberg, Sebastian
    Haefner, Matthias
    Kargus, Steffen
    Plinkert, Peter K.
    Debus, Jurgen
    Rieken, Stefan
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 127 - 136
  • [4] Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients
    Raynor, EM
    Williams, MF
    Martindale, RG
    Porubsky, ES
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1999, 120 (04) : 479 - 482
  • [5] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube dependence following chemoradiation in head and neck cancer patients
    Pohar, Surjeet
    Demarcantonio, Michael
    Whiting, Phillip
    Crandley, Edwin
    Wadsworth, John
    Karakla, Daniel
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (06): : 1366 - 1371
  • [6] STOMAL SEEDING OF HEAD AND NECK-CANCER BY PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT
    LEE, DS
    MOHITTABATABAI, MA
    RUSH, BF
    LEVINE, C
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [7] Utility of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation: A prospective observational cohort
    Dechaphunkul, Tanadech
    Soonthornrak, Pawitra
    Geater, Sarayut Lucien
    Dechaphunkul, Arunee
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 43 (04)
  • [8] Comparison of Prophylactic and Emergent Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Patients Treated with Chemotherapy and Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer
    Berlach, D. M.
    Nguyen, N.
    Cury, F.
    Al Halabi, H.
    Shenouda, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S437 - S437
  • [9] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement by otorhinolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons
    Back, Leif J. J.
    Benders, Alexander
    Pietarinen, Petra
    Keski-Santti, Harri
    Markkanen-Leppanen, Mari
    Udd, Marianne
    Halttunen, Jorma
    Makitie, Antti A.
    Kylanpaa, Leena
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2014, 134 (07) : 760 - 767
  • [10] Seeding of Head and Neck Cancer during Placement of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube
    Luckey, Lisa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 107 : S279 - S279