HUMIC SUBSTANCES IN ACID ORGANIC SOILS - MODELING THEIR RELEASE TO THE SOIL SOLUTION IN TERMS OF HUMIC CHARGE

被引:81
|
作者
TIPPING, E
WOOF, C
机构
[1] Institute of Freshwater Ecology, Windermere Laboratory, Ambleside, Cumbria
来源
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE | 1990年 / 41卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00227.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Batch titration experiments were carried out with organic soil samples in order to investigate the release to the solution phase of humic substances (HS). Measurements were made of pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration, and the concentration of mono‐meric (inorganic + organic) aluminium, as functions of added acid or base. DOC was taken to be entirely due to HS. The results can be interpreted in terms of a model in which the soil is considered to contain two types of HS–mobile or potentially mobile (HSM), and immobile (HSI). The binding of inorganic ions by the HS is calculated using humic ion‐binding model IV, previously developed in this laboratory. Model IV allows the charges on the HS (ZHSM, ZHST) to be calculated; these are determined mainly by the binding of H+ and A13+. Concentrations of HS in solution, [HSaq], are given by the equation: (Formula Presented.) where |ZHSM| is the modulus of ZHSM, nHSM is the carboxyl group content of HSM, cHSM is the soil content of HSM, β is a fitting parameter, and square brackets, [ ], indicate concentrations. For most of the soils a value for β of 3 gives acceptable agreements between measured and calculated values of [HSaq], indicating a major influence of charge on release. The optimized value of cHSM differs considerably among soils, whereas cHIS varies by only a factor of about two. Total humic contents (cHSM+ cHSI estimated by model optimization are in approximate agreement with values estimated by extraction of the soils with NaOH. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 586
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HUMIC SUBSTANCES IN ACID SOILS - MODELING ION-BINDING AND THE RELEASE OF ORGANIC-MATTER TO THE SOIL SOLUTION
    TIPPING, E
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1989, 198 : 75 - GEOC
  • [2] Molecular modeling of humic substances: Binding of hydrophobic organic compounds to Chelsea humic acid.
    Diallo, M
    Huang, WL
    Goddard, WA
    Johnson, JH
    Weber, WJ
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 221 : U474 - U475
  • [3] A MODEL OF SOLID-SOLUTION INTERACTIONS IN ACID ORGANIC SOILS, BASED ON THE COMPLEXATION PROPERTIES OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES
    TIPPING, E
    HURLEY, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1988, 39 (04): : 505 - 519
  • [4] MODELING THE SOLID-SOLUTION DISTRIBUTIONS OF PROTONS, ALUMINUM, BASE CATIONS AND HUMIC SUBSTANCES IN ACID SOILS
    TIPPING, E
    BERGGREN, D
    MULDER, J
    WOOF, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1995, 46 (01) : 77 - 94
  • [5] THE DISTRIBUTION OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES BETWEEN THE SOLID AND AQUEOUS PHASES OF ACID ORGANIC SOILS - A DESCRIPTION BASED ON HUMIC HETEROGENEITY AND CHARGE-DEPENDENT SORPTION EQUILIBRIA
    TIPPING, E
    WOOF, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1991, 42 (03): : 437 - 448
  • [6] A new approach to the structural analysis of humic substances in water and soils - Humic acid oligomers
    Schulten, HR
    [J]. HUMIC AND FULVIC ACIDS: ISOLATION, STRUCTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ROLE, 1996, 651 : 42 - 56
  • [7] ON THE CHARACTERIZATION OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES IN SOILS
    POST, B
    HEMPFLING, R
    KLAMBERG, H
    SCHULTEN, HR
    [J]. FRESENIUS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANALYTISCHE CHEMIE, 1988, 331 (3-4): : 273 - 281
  • [8] Amino acid composition of humic substances in tundra soils
    R. S. Vasilevich
    V. A. Beznosikov
    [J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2015, 48 : 593 - 599
  • [9] Amino acid composition of humic substances in tundra soils
    Vasilevich, R. S.
    Beznosikov, V. A.
    [J]. EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2015, 48 (06) : 593 - 599
  • [10] AROMATICITY OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES IN SOILS
    HATCHER, PG
    SCHNITZER, M
    DENNIS, LW
    MACIEL, GE
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1981, 45 (06) : 1089 - 1094