Interpretation Methods in the us Supreme Court: Study of Obamacare, Abortion Cases and Alien Torts Statute Cases

被引：0
|
作者：
Demeyere, Siel [1 ]
Beke, Joris [2 ]
Dietvorst, Renate [3 ]
机构：
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Brussels Bar, Quinz, Vilvoorde, Belgium
[3] Maastricht Univ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
来源：
TILBURG LAW REVIEW-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW | 2015年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词：
US Supreme Court; Interpretation methods; Obamacare; Abortion cases; Alien Torts Statute;
D O I：
10.1163/22112596-02002005
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
In this article, the interpretation methods used by the United States Supreme Court are studied. We will discuss the interpretation methods used by the Court in the Obamacare case, in abortion cases and in Alien Torts Statute cases. This analysis concludes by asserting the Court is very eclectic in the interpretation methods it uses, although consequential reasoning is most often relied upon.
引用
收藏
页码：142 / 160
页数：19
相关论文
共 42 条
12345