CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER TOXICITY

被引:67
|
作者
RAMOSKA, EA
SPILLER, HA
MYERS, A
机构
[1] Division of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, Methodist Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
[3] Delaware Valley Regional Poison Control Center, Philadelphia, PA
关键词
calcium channel blocker; toxicity;
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82469-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were reported to a regional poison control center after "overdose" of a calcium channel blocker during a two-year period (1987 and 1988). An analysis of 91 patient cases is presented after excluding allergic reactions, cases involving coingestants, and patients lost to follow-up. Patients who developed any symptoms after ingestion were defined as manifesting toxicity. There were 38 cases of verapamil ingestion with toxicity developing in 18 patients. The mean nontoxic dose was 320 mg, whereas the mean toxic ingestion was 3.2 g. Nine patients became hypotensive, 13 developed conduction system abnormalities (sinus node suppression, atrioventricular nodal block, or bundle branch block), and 11 manifested arrhythmias. Ten developed neurological symptoms. There were 31 cases of nifedipine ingestion with toxicity developing in seven patients. The mean nontoxic dose was 19 mg, while the mean toxic ingestion was 340 mg. Four patients were hypotensive, only one developed cardiac conduction abnormalities, and four developed arrhythmias. Three had neurological symptoms. There were 24 cases of diltiazem ingestion with only minor toxicity developing in four patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of hypotension, arrhythmias, or neurological symptoms in patients who overdosed with verapamil as compared with nifedipine (by Fisher's exact test). However, conduction system abnormalities were more common with verapamil ingestion (P < .05). Toxic manifestations after diltiazem overdose were uncommon in our study. Eighteen of the 29 patients who developed toxicity required treatment in excess of gastrointestinal decontamination. Calcium was administered to 14 patients and was helpful in five. © 1990 American College of Emergency Physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 653
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calcium-Channel Blocker Overdose
    Anderson, Angela C.
    [J]. CLINICAL PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 6 (02) : 109 - 115
  • [2] ISOFLURANE IS NOT A CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER
    BLAISE, GA
    SILL, JC
    NUGENT, M
    VANHOUTTE, PM
    [J]. CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1986, 9 (03): : A21 - A21
  • [3] CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER OVERDOSE
    PROANO, L
    CHIANG, WK
    WANG, RY
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 13 (04): : 444 - 450
  • [4] Beta-blocker and calcium-channel blocker toxicity: current evidence on evaluation and management
    Goldfine, Charlotte E.
    Troger, Andrew
    Erickson, Timothy B.
    Chai, Peter R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2024, 13 (02) : 247 - 253
  • [5] FDA warns on calcium-channel blocker
    Ault, A
    [J]. LANCET, 1998, 351 (9095): : 44 - 44
  • [6] BRAIN EXTRACTION OF A CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER
    GROTTA, JC
    PETTIGREW, LC
    LOCKWOOD, AH
    REICH, C
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1987, 21 (02) : 171 - 175
  • [7] Mibefradil - A new calcium-channel blocker
    不详
    [J]. MEDICAL LETTER ON DRUGS AND THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 39 (1013): : 103 - 105
  • [8] CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER ENHANCEMENT OF ANTICANCER DRUG CYTO-TOXICITY - A REVIEW
    HELSON, L
    [J]. CANCER DRUG DELIVERY, 1984, 1 (04): : 353 - 361
  • [9] A ONE-YEAR EVALUATION OF CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER OVERDOSES - TOXICITY AND TREATMENT
    RAMOSKA, EA
    SPILLER, HA
    WINTER, M
    BORYS, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (02) : 196 - 200
  • [10] EFFECTS OF CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER OVERDOSE-INDUCED TOXICITY IN THE CONSCIOUS DOG
    SCHOFFSTALL, JM
    SPIVEY, WH
    GAMBONE, LM
    SHAW, RP
    SIT, SP
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (10) : 1104 - 1108