Differences between Croatia and EU Candidate Countries: the CAGE Distance Framework

被引:4
|
作者
Miloloza, Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Econ & Business, Zagreb, Croatia
来源
BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL | 2015年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
the CAGE Distance Framework; Croatia; EU candidate countries;
D O I
10.1515/bsrj-2015-0011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: Nowadays, international cooperation is unevenly divided among countries. The decisive criteria imply cultural, administrative, geographical, and economical closeness among countries. Therefore, understanding such factors can significantly facilitate the performance of the company on foreign market. Objectives: The goal of this paper is to identify the fundamental differences between Croatia and the EU candidate countries through a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the determinants within the CAGE Distance Framework. This systematic analysis can significantly intensify Croatia's international exchange and improve Croatia's performance at important foreign markets. Methods/Approach: Research comprises original datasets on distance factors within CAGE distance framework. With cultural, administrative, geographic and economic data of Croatia and EU candidate countries, empirical support about the impact of distinctions on international exchange has been given. Results: Cultural and geographical similarities are particularly noticeable among Croatia and EU candidate countries, although there are also no significant differences in the administrative and the economic dimension. However, Turkey is the only country that somewhat differs in each segment. Conclusions: Similarities have significant influence on cross-border trade. With all present similarities and differences, cooperation among Croatia and the EU candidate countries has a perspective for development, especially at a time when all candidate countries join the EU.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 62
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CAGE DISTANCE FRAMEWORK BETWEEN CROATIA AND AUSTRIA
    Peternel, Ivona
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2017: CURRENT ISSUES OF WORLD ECONOMY AND POLITICS, 2017, : 843 - 850
  • [2] INFLUENCE OF EU ENLARGEMENT ON EUROPEANIZATION AND DEMOCRATIZATION OF CANDIDATE COUNTRIES ON THE EXAMPLE OF SERBIA AND CROATIA
    Rudneva, Tatyana S.
    [J]. POLITEIA-JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIOLOGY OF POLITICS, 2019, 93 (02): : 168 - 184
  • [3] THE SOCIAL POLICY CHALLENGES OF EUROPE 2020 IN THE EU CANDIDATE COUNTRIES: THE CASE OF CROATIA AND MACEDONIA
    Gerovska Mitev, Maja
    Stubbs, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2012, 5 (01): : 60 - 72
  • [4] DRIVERS OF FINANCIAL BEHAVIOUR: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE EU COUNTRIES
    Pecina, Ena
    Kristic, Irena Raguz
    Sabot, Andrija
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM REGION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, DEVELOPMENT (RED 2022), 2022, : 575 - 595
  • [5] TENDENCIES OF POVERTY IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA AND THE EU COUNTRIES
    Aksentijevic, Nada Karaman
    Jezic, Zoran
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, VOL IV, 2014, : 659 - 670
  • [6] Environmental technical efficiency in EU member and candidate countries: A parametric hyperbolic distance function approach
    Duman, Yavuz Selman
    Kasman, Adnan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 147 : 297 - 307
  • [7] OVERLAPS AND DIFFERENCES IN THE PICO CRITERIA BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT EU COUNTRIES
    Gallinger, P.
    Bonduelle, D.
    Mattern, F.
    Plantor, S.
    Schmalhofer, C.
    Streicher, S.
    Troubat, A.
    van Engen, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S347 - S347
  • [8] Comparing public attitudes on EU membership in candidate countries: the cases of Croatia, Macedonia and Turkey from 2004 to 2011
    Carkoglu, Ali
    Glupker-Kesebir, Gitta
    [J]. SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN AND BLACK SEA STUDIES, 2016, 16 (02) : 255 - 274
  • [9] A framework for the decomposition of poverty differences with an application to poverty differences between countries
    Martin Biewen
    Stephen P. Jenkins
    [J]. Empirical Economics, 2005, 30 : 331 - 358
  • [10] A framework for the decomposition of poverty differences with an application to poverty differences between countries
    Biewen, M
    Jenkins, SP
    [J]. EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 30 (02) : 331 - 358