Responsiveness of Auditors to the Audit Risk Standards: Unique Evidence from Big 4 Audit Firms

被引:13
|
作者
Niemi, Lasse [1 ]
Knechel, W. Robert [2 ]
Ojala, Hannu [1 ,3 ]
Collis, Jill [4 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Business Sch, Runeberginkatu 22-24, FI-00076 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Florida, Fisher Sch Accounting, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Tampere, Dept Accounting, Kalevantie 4, Tampere 33100, Finland
[4] Brunel Univ London, Brunel Business Sch, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
关键词
audit effort; audit regulation; audit risk; business risk approach;
D O I
10.1080/17449480.2018.1431398
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the effect of changes in audit risk standards on the conduct of financial statement audits in a European setting. We investigate this by analysing the audit hours and audit fees for clients of Big 4 audit firms in Finland in 1996 and 2010. Our results show that audit firms became more sensitive to clients' business risk due to the introduction of the new audit risk standards, with more audit hours allocated to owner-managed companies in 2010 than in 1996, and fewer audit hours allocated to low-risk clients in 2010 than in 1996. Also, the labour mix in the audit team changed for owner-managed companies, with a greater work load carried by junior auditors in 2010 than in 1996. Regarding the price of audit, we find an increase in audit fees for clients with high business risk, while audit fees remained at roughly the same level for low-risk clients. These findings should be of interest to the auditing profession and those involved in the development of auditing regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 54
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are the Big 4 audit firms homogeneous? Further evidence from audit pricing
    Hrazdil, Karel
    Simunic, Dan A.
    Suwanyangyuan, Nattavut
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2020, 24 (03) : 347 - 365
  • [2] Affiliation of local audit firms with Big4 auditors and capital structure: evidence from Indonesia
    Kurniawati, Heny
    Van Cauwenberge, Philippe
    Vander Bauwhede, Heidi
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2020, 35 (06) : 731 - 757
  • [3] The Use of Business Risk Audit Perspectives by Non-Big 4 Audit Firms
    van Buuren, Joost
    Koch, Christopher
    Amerongen, Niels van Nieuw
    Wright, Arnold M.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (03): : 105 - 128
  • [4] Does audit quality affect auditors' career development? Evidence from Chinese audit firms' demise
    Chen, Hanwen
    Feng, Yang
    Kou, Aiju
    Liu, Siyi
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2024, 39 (04) : 419 - 441
  • [5] Who makes partner in Big 4 audit firms? e Evidence from Germany
    Downar, Benedikt
    Ernstberger, Juergen
    Koch, Christopher
    [J]. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2021, 91
  • [6] Auditing the auditors: Evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms
    Lennox, Clive
    Pittman, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2010, 49 (1-2): : 84 - 103
  • [7] Fee competition among Big 4 auditors and audit quality
    Sharad Asthana
    Inder Khurana
    K. K. Raman
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2019, 52 : 403 - 438
  • [8] Fee competition among Big 4 auditors and audit quality
    Asthana, Sharad
    Khurana, Inder
    Raman, K. K.
    [J]. REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2019, 52 (02) : 403 - 438
  • [9] Mandatory rotation of audit firms and auditors in Greece
    Persefoni Polychronidou
    George Drogalas
    Ioannis Tampakoudis
    [J]. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2020, 17 : 141 - 154
  • [10] Big N Auditors and Audit Quality: New Evidence from Quasi-Experiments
    Jiang, John
    Wang, Isabel Yanyan
    Wang, K. Philip
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2019, 94 (01): : 205 - 227