Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation

被引:12
|
作者
Leitao, Kristian [1 ]
Grimstad, Tore [1 ]
Bretthauer, Michael [2 ]
Holme, Oyvind [3 ,5 ]
Paulsen, Vemund [2 ]
Karlsen, Lars [1 ]
Isaksen, Kjetil [1 ]
Cvancarova, Milada [4 ]
Aabakken, Lars [2 ]
机构
[1] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Stavanger, Norway
[2] Oslo Univ Hosp, Rikshosp, Dept Transplantat Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Sorlandet Hosp, Dept Med, Kristiansand, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Biostat, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Insitute Hlth & Soc, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1377520
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: Polyethylene glycolbased electrolyte solutions (PEG-ELS) and the combination of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) are commonly used bowel preparation agents. The aim of the present study was to compare the two agents with regard to cleansing efficacy and tolerance among individuals scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy. Materials and methods: The 368 colonoscopy outpatients at three Norwegian hospitals were randomized to bowel lavage with either PEG-ELS or SPMC. Compliance and patient tolerance were evaluated using a patient questionnaire. Bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Quality Scale (OBPS), a validated scoring system with scores between 0 (best) and 14. Results: There was no difference in the cleansing quality between the PEG-ELS and SPMC groups (median OBPS 5.0 in both groups). The group that received SPMC reported better overall patient tolerance than the PEG-ELS group (72.6% vs 59.0% reporting no or slight discomfort, P<0.01). Compliance with the recommended total fluid intake (4L) was better in the SPMC group than in the PEG-ELS group (94.2% vs 81.2% respectively, P<0.01); moreover, the polyp detection rate was superior (34.3% vs 23.3 %, P=0.02). Conclusion: PEG-ELS and SPMC are equally effective in cleansing efficacy, but SPMC was better tolerated by patients and resulted in superior patient compliance and polyp detection rate.
引用
收藏
页码:E230 / E234
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between three sachets of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol as colonoscopy preparation
    Yoon, Young Joon
    Kim, Seong Eun
    Yoo, Hee Yong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 120 - 120
  • [2] Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation
    Zheng Jin
    Yi Lu
    Yi Zhou
    Biao Gong
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2016, 72 : 523 - 532
  • [3] Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation
    Jin, Zheng
    Lu, Yi
    Zhou, Yi
    Gong, Biao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 72 (05) : 523 - 532
  • [4] Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation
    Jin, Zheng
    Lu, Yi
    Gong, Biao
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 177 - 177
  • [5] Effectiveness of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (PICO) for Colonoscopy Preparation
    Song, Ki Hwan
    Suh, Wu Seok
    Jeong, Jin Sik
    Kim, Dong Sik
    Kim, Sang Woo
    Kwak, Dong Min
    Hwang, Jong Seong
    Kim, Hyun Jin
    Park, Man Woo
    Shim, Min Chul
    Koo, Ja-Il
    Kim, Jae Hwang
    Shon, Dae Ho
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 30 (05) : 222 - 227
  • [6] Severe hyponatremia secondary to preparation for colonoscopy with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate
    Azcune-Echeverria, Olatz
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2019, 111 (03) : 249 - 249
  • [7] A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Miguel Muñoz-Navas
    José Luis Calleja
    Guillermo Payeras
    Antonio José Hervás
    Luis Esteban Abreu
    Víctor Orive
    Pedro L. Menchén
    José María Bordas
    José Ramón Armengol
    Cristina Carretero
    Vicente Pons Beltrán
    Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu
    Román Manteca
    Adolfo Parra-Blanco
    Fernando Carballo
    Juan Manuel Herrerías
    Carlos Badiola
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2015, 30 : 1407 - 1416
  • [8] A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Munoz-Navas, Miguel
    Luis Calleja, Jose
    Payeras, Guillermo
    Jose Hervas, Antonio
    Esteban Abreu, Luis
    Orive, Victor
    Menchen, Pedro L.
    Maria Bordas, Jose
    Ramon Armengol, Jose
    Carretero, Cristina
    Pons Beltran, Vicente
    Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada
    Manteca, Roman
    Parra-Blanco, Adolfo
    Carballo, Fernando
    Manuel Herrerias, Juan
    Badiola, Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (10) : 1407 - 1416
  • [9] Audit of bowel preparation with Picolax® (sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate) for colonoscopy
    Thomson, J
    Phull, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 60 (05) : 602 - 603
  • [10] A randomized clinical prospective trial comparing split-dose picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation
    Rostom, Alaa
    Dube, Catherine
    Bishay, Kirles
    Antonova, Lilia
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Hilsden, Robert
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):