ORAL CHLORAL HYDRATE PROVIDES EFFECTIVE AND SAFE SEDATION IN PEDIATRIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING

被引:47
|
作者
RONCHERAOMS, CL
CASILLAS, C
MARTIBONMATI, L
POYATOS, C
TOMAS, J
SOBEJANO, A
JIMENEZ, NV
机构
[1] UNIV VALENCIA,COLEGIO UNIV CEU SAN PABLO,SCH PHARM,MONCADA,SPAIN
[2] HOSP DR PESET,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,E-46017 VALENCIA,SPAIN
[3] UNIV VALENCIA,DEPT PHARM & PHARMACEUT,BURJASSOT,SPAIN
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2710.1994.tb00680.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Sedation is routinely required for successful Magnetic Resonance imaging in infants and children. Five hundred and ninety-six paediatric patients (270 female and 326 male, age (mean +/- SD) 41 +/- 30 months and weight 14.8 +/- 6.5 kg) entered an open, non-comparative, prospective study to assess oral chloral hydrate sedation in a large and homogeneous paediatric population undergoing Magnetic Resonance imaging. Chloral hydrate syrup 70 mg/ml was administered 20-40 min prior to the procedure. Effective sedation was reached in 94-1% with a total dose (mean +/- SEM) of 68 +/- 1 mg/kg (range 20-170 mg/kg). Statistical analysis of sedation failures vs. successful examinations after the total dose showed significant differences for dose (62 +/- 4 vs. 69 +/- 1 mg/kg; P<0.05), age (64 +/- 7 vs. 40 +/- 1 months; P<0.001) and weight (19.8 +/- 1.5 vs. 14.5 +/- 0.0 kg; P<0.001). Effectiveness fell to around 80% in children with encephalic white matter alterations, medullary tumours or syringohydromyela (P=0.07). The mean time of onset of sedation was 26 +/- 1 min, and the mean time to spontaneous awakening after the completion of the Magnetic Resonance examination was 38 +/- 2 min. Fifty-nine children (9.9%) experienced adverse reactions, with nausea and vomiting being the most common (n=41), followed by nervousness and unusual excitement (n=6). Discriminant function analysis identified age and total dose as the quantitative variables helping to differentiate between sedation failures and satisfactory examinations (sensitivity=0.73, and specificity=0.61; r=0.20, P<0.001). Sedation failure rates were very low (<5%) for children under 36 months old, but still low (<7.5%) for children up to 7 years old. Older children (>7 years) showed unacceptable failure rates (>15%). Low sedation failure rates (<5%) and few adverse reactions (<10%) were obtained in the 61.70 mg/kg and 71-80 mg/kg dose ranges. Lower doses produced higher sedation failure rates, while higher doses increased the incidence of adverse reactions. Assuming a recommended sedative paediatric dose of 70 mg/kg, and the possibility to re-administer half the dose if adequate sedation was not achieved, a maximum total dose per procedure around 100 mg/kg is proposed. We conclude that oral chloral hydrate is a safe and consistently effective short-term sedative, and it probably should be considered the drug of choice in infants and children undergoing Magnetic Resonance examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 243
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ADMINISTRATION OF ORAL CHLORAL HYDRATE TO PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS UNDERGOING MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    RONCHERA, CL
    MARTIBONMATI, L
    POYATOS, C
    VILAR, J
    JIMENEZ, NV
    PHARMACEUTISCH WEEKBLAD-SCIENTIFIC EDITION, 1992, 14 (06) : 349 - 352
  • [2] Efficacy of Chloral Hydrate-Hydroxyzine and Chloral Hydrate-Midazolam in Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation
    Fallah, Razieh
    Fadavi, Nafiseh
    Behdad, Shekofah
    Fallah Tafti, Mohammad
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2014, 8 (02) : 31 - 37
  • [3] Chloral hydrate sedation for magnetic resonance imaging in newborn infants
    Finnemore, Anna
    Toulmin, Hilary
    Merchant, Naz
    Arichi, Tom
    Tusor, Nora
    Cox, David
    Ederies, Ash
    Nongena, Phumza
    Ko, Christopher
    Dias, Ryan
    Edwards, Anthony D.
    Groves, Alan M.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (02) : 190 - 195
  • [4] Safe pediatric outpatient sedation: The chloral hydrate debate revisited
    Malis, DJ
    Burton, DM
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1997, 116 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [5] IS ORAL PHENOBARBITAL A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO ORAL CHLORAL HYDRATE?
    Patel, Sajal
    Anderson, Jordan
    Birisci, Esma
    Smith, Martha
    Dalabih, Abdallah
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)
  • [6] Functional Mapping in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgical Candidates: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Under Sedation With Chloral Hydrate
    Ives-Deliperi, Victoria L.
    Butler, James T.
    PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2015, 53 (06) : 478 - 484
  • [7] Chloral hydrate in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of a 10-year sedation experience administered by radiologists
    Jorge Delgado
    Rodrigo Toro
    Simon Rascovsky
    Andres Arango
    Gabriel J. Angel
    Victor Calvo
    Jorge A. Delgado
    Pediatric Radiology, 2015, 45 : 108 - 114
  • [8] Chloral hydrate in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of a 10-year sedation experience administered by radiologists
    Delgado, Jorge
    Toro, Rodrigo
    Rascovsky, Simon
    Arango, Andres
    Angel, Gabriel J.
    Calvo, Victor
    Delgado, Jorge A.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) : 108 - 114
  • [9] Comparison of rescue techniques for failed chloral hydrate sedation for magnetic resonance imaging scansadditional chloral hydrate vs intranasal dexmedetomidine
    Zhang, Wenhua
    Wang, Zixin
    Song, Xingrong
    Fan, Yanting
    Tian, Hang
    Li, Bilian
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2016, 26 (03) : 273 - 279
  • [10] EVALUATION OF CHLORAL HYDRATE FOR PEDIATRIC SEDATION
    LICHENSTEIN, R
    KING, JC
    BICE, D
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1993, 32 (10) : 632 - 633