THE OCONNOR PRECEDENT - SHOULD SUPREME-COURT NOMINEES HAVE OPINIONS

被引：0

|

作者：

LEVINSON, S ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV TEXAS,SCH LAW,HOUSTON,TX 77025

来源：

NATION | 1981年 / 233卷 / 12期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：375 / 376

页数：2

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] OVERRULING OPINIONS IN THE SUPREME-COURT
BLAUSTEIN, AP
FIELD, AH
[J]. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 1958, 57 (02) : 151 - 199
[2] SUPREME-COURT NOMINEES - DONT PLAY POLITICS
FEIN, B
[J]. ABA JOURNAL, 1991, 77 : 39 - 39
[3] SUPREME-COURT NOMINEES - MORE THAN A SYMBOL
SCHAFRAN, LH
[J]. ABA JOURNAL, 1991, 77 : 38 - 38
[4] CAMERAS IN THE SUPREME-COURT - SHOULD SUPREME-COURT PROCEEDINGS BE TELEVISED
DYK, T
DONALD, B
[J]. ABA JOURNAL, 1989, 75 : 34 - 35
[5] SENATE VOTING ON SUPREME-COURT NOMINEES - A NEOINSTITUTIONAL MODEL
CAMERON, CM
COVER, AD
SEGAL, JA
[J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1990, 84 (02) : 525 - 534
[6] SURFACE MINING - WILL SUPREME-COURT PRECEDENT BE RECLAIMED
SAMUELS, LB
[J]. AMERICAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL, 1981, 19 (01) : 47 - 62
[7] RELEVANCE OF POLICY VALUES FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF SUPREME-COURT NOMINEES
SONGER, DR
[J]. LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1979, 13 (04) : 927 - 948
[8] CONFLICT WITH SUPREME-COURT PRECEDENT AND THE GRANTING OF PLENARY REVIEW
ULMER, SS
[J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1983, 45 (02): : 474 - 478
[9] CAN THE SENATE EXAMINE THE CONSTITUTIONAL PHILOSOPHIES OF SUPREME-COURT NOMINEES
COMISKEY, M
[J]. PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 1993, 26 (03) : 495 - 500
[10] ON THE CHOICE OF MAJOR PREMISES IN SUPREME-COURT OPINIONS
MILLER, AS
[J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW, 1965, 14 (02): : 251 - 275

← 1 2 3 4 5 →