The concept 'science', like so many others concepts used by humans, is a response to their need for communication and for explaining their surrounding reality. This reality focuses all the interests and efforts of the scientific community towards improving its understanding. These advances, plagued with efforts, but also with different points of view are materialized and explained through various paradigms of action. The evolution of how the scientific community understands the reality is conditioned by the need to optimize the employed tools, as well as the ability to understand, respect and deal with these advances. It is in this sense where we can consider the concept of science disciplines as well as interactive and relational models which have been detected among these disciplines over the time: Multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity. The question is what happens when the theoretical framework used as explanatory tools, run at the same time as a paradigmatic prison? Assessing the current organizational structure of the scientific framework and proposing new options to advance this issue are first-order needs. This is the way how the concept of 'transdisciplinarity' emerged within a framework of scientific thoughts, where it is not clear to what extent the effort to innovate in one discipline is used as a weapon to subjugate the knowledge generated by other disciplines. The transfer to the sciences of physical activity and sports as a perspective for the study of human motor manifestations permits the understanding of this specific situation, while being only a link within the framework of the scientific paradigm.