TAX BURDEN AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: SEARCH FOR AN EFFECTIVE MODEL

被引:2
|
作者
Maria, Kakaulina O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amur State Univ, Blagoveshchensk, Russia
来源
关键词
concept of the Laffer curve; optimal tax burden; economic growth; resource potential; simulation; region;
D O I
10.17223/15617793/394/30
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The adjustment of monetary policy and macroeconomic indicators (exchange rate of the national currency, refinancing rate, inflation rate) justifies the need to clarify the priorities of the tax policy and to consider possible ways of reforming the current Russian tax system. Hence an adequate assessment of the impact of possible changes in tax legislation on economic development is very important not only at the country level, but also at the level of its regions. However, most existing methodologies for assessing the impact of tax burden on the economy have considerable disadvantages. From the above, particularly important are issues related to the development of methods of economic tools to evaluate the impact of the tax burden on the gross regional product (GRP), which will provide more efficient construction of the budget and tax system of the country taking into account interests of the state and business in different regions. The purpose of the research is determination of critical values of the optimal tax burden in regions with different resource potential. Theoretical and methodological base of the research was the concept of the Laffer curve. The most important indicator of economic development of the area is its resource potential. The author of the article proposes the following elements of the resource potential of a region: labor, natural resources, innovation potentials, potential capital investment. It should be noted that basic labor and capital resources are present in every region, but natural and innovative resources are very unevenly distributed across the country. Taking into account this fact, the author develops a classification of the subjects of the Russian Federation in accordance with their resource potential. This classification involves division of regions into commodity and innovation regions. The group of commodity regions comprises four subgroups: mineral, land, forest and water regions. Using this classification, a model of the impact of the tax burden on GDP was developed, where the third factor (after labor and capital) for each classification group is its own indicator: natural (or innovation) resources. The model is based on a linear non-homogeneous production function, the quadratic functions of the tax burden are marginal productivities of factors. In theory, the proposed model is fitting, because the functions it presents behave satisfactorily at the extreme values of the tax burden, and these functions have all the properties inherent to a linear non-homogeneous production function. Based on this model, the critical values of the optimal tax burden in the subjects with varying resource potential are calculated. Thus, in the land regions the optimal level of the tax burden is approximately 13 %, in the innovation regions 17 %, and in the mineral regions 54 %. The results may be used by public authorities in determining the basic parameters of the regional tax systems.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE IMPACT OF THE EFFECTIVE TAX BURDEN AND GOVERNMENT SPENDING ON THE ECONOMIC GROWTH
    Macek, Rudolf
    Machova, Zuzana
    Kotlan, Igor
    [J]. 7TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2013, : 859 - 868
  • [2] TAX BURDEN AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN OECD COUNTRIES
    Kotlan, Igor
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRIES, 2010, : 192 - 198
  • [3] The Impact of The Tax Burden on The Economic Growth of BRICS Countries
    Tsilikova, Marina Sergeevna
    Golubtsova, Ekaterina Vladimirovna
    Scherbakova, Tatiana Sergeevna
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 2990 - 2998
  • [4] The effect of tax burden on economic growth in the European Union
    Szarowska, Irena
    [J]. 28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS 2010, PTS I AND II, 2010, : 596 - 601
  • [5] TAX BURDEN ON WAGE EARNERS IN POSTWAR JAPANESE ECONOMIC GROWTH
    YAMAMURA, K
    [J]. NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 1966, 19 (01) : 58 - 69
  • [6] Lifting the burden: fundamental tax reform and US economic growth
    Jorgenson, D
    Yun, KY
    [J]. FIRMS' INVESTMENT AND FINANCE DECISIONS: THEORY AND EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY, 2003, : 13 - 39
  • [7] The Relationship between Tax Burden and Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey
    Sarac, Taha Bahadir
    [J]. MALIYE DERGISI, 2015, (169): : 21 - 35
  • [8] THE IMPACT OF THE TAX BURDEN ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE CASE OF EU COUNTRIES
    Garsviene, Lina
    Matuzeviciute, Kristina
    Mundryte, Aurika
    Rupliene, Dovile
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 2022, 2022, : 17 - 25
  • [9] Tax burden and economic growth in OECD countries: Two indicators comparison
    Zimcik, Petr
    [J]. 34TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS (MME 2016), 2016, : 928 - 933
  • [10] Tax Burden and Economic Growth: 1989-2011 Turkey Experience
    Mangir, Fatih
    Ertugrul, Hasan Murat
    [J]. MALIYE DERGISI, 2012, (162): : 256 - 265