Abductive Grounded Theory: a worked example of a study in construction management

被引:22
|
作者
Rahmani, Farshid [1 ]
Leifels, Katrin [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct & Project Management, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Abductive approach; grounded theory; qualitative research; research methodology;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2018.1449954
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Grounded Theory, now more than 50 years old, is a qualitative research approach widely employed in the social and human science studies to develop theories with a high degree of conceptuality. For construction management research, given the nature of this applied sub-discipline of management, a paradigmatic shift in Grounded Theory is needed, from classical positivism to pragmatism. Abductive Grounded Theory is posited as the way to achieve this shift in research methodology. The proposition is explored through a worked example, using Early Contractor Involvement research as a case study to demonstrate the research process. The data analysis process of open coding, axial coding and selective coding is described, together with the process of matching complementary prospect theory to explain the interdependencies between theoretical categories. The issues of validity and reliability are addressed. Of particular importance is the faithfulness to the original analytical coding process and then abduction of existing theories from salient literature to explain the relationships amongst emergent concepts. The findings show that, while the development of the research question is initially influenced by the review of literature, there is no deliberate effort to direct or force the collected information towards any set of pre-defined concepts. The study shows promising potential for using Abductive Grounded Theory to develop conceptual and instrumental theories in construction management research.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 583
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices
    Alexandra Sbaraini
    Stacy M Carter
    R Wendell Evans
    Anthony Blinkhorn
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11
  • [2] How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices
    Sbaraini, Alexandra
    Carter, Stacy M.
    Evans, R. Wendell
    Blinkhorn, Anthony
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
  • [3] Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis
    Timmermans, Stefan
    Tavory, Iddo
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2012, 30 (03) : 167 - 186
  • [4] Abductive theory construction
    Janiszewski, Chris
    van Osselaer, Stijn M. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 175 - 193
  • [5] Sifting, sorting and saturating data in a grounded theory study of information use by practice nurses: A worked example
    Hoare, Karen J.
    Mills, Jane
    Francis, Karen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (06) : 582 - 588
  • [6] Grounded theory of construction crisis management
    Loosemore, Martin
    [J]. Construction Management and Economics, 1999, 17 (01): : 9 - 19
  • [7] Using QSR-NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example
    Hutchison, Andrew John
    Johnston, Lynne Halley
    Breckon, Jeff David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 13 (04) : 283 - 302
  • [8] Using Constructivist Grounded Theory to Examine the Experiences of Black British Female Managers: A Worked Example
    Miller, Denise A.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2022, 27 (10): : 2135 - 2156
  • [9] Inductive, Deductive and Abductive Approaches in Generating New Ideas: A Modified Grounded Theory Study
    Osman, Sharifah
    Mohammad, Shahrin
    Abu, Mohd Salleh
    Mokhtar, Mahani
    Ahmad, Jamilah
    Ismail, Norulhuda
    Jambari, Hanifah
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 24 (04) : 2378 - 2381
  • [10] Building Knowledge - Developing a Grounded Theory of Knowledge Management for Construction
    Graham, Brian
    Thomas, Ken
    [J]. 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, : 169 - 176