Consultative multi-criteria decision making process for drought security

被引:1
|
作者
Mukheibir, Pierre [1 ]
Cole, Cathy [2 ]
Drinkwater, Kate [2 ]
Abeysuriya, Kumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Inst Sustainable Futures, POB 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] NSW Dept Primary Ind, Metropolitan Water Directorate, Newcastle West, NSW 2302, Australia
来源
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
consultation; drought; MCDA; multi-criteria analysis; resilience; urban;
D O I
10.2166/wpt.2015.089
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Water businesses have always sought to plan for drought-resilient urban water supply systems, especially in areas with extreme climate variability. The recently completed Lower Hunter Water Plan was developed to support population and business growth, and ensure reliable water supplies in drought. As well as introducing Water Wise Rules to encourage water conservation in normal conditions, the plan identified a portfolio (or combination) of drought response measures to be deployed progressively in a drought as water storage levels drop. The keys to the success of the Plan were thorough consultation with stakeholders, and collaborative analysis facilitating transparent evaluation of trade-offs among options and portfolios. A multi-criteria decision analysis process guided the assessment of the drought response options against both quantitative and qualitative criteria, and the assembly and analysis of portfolios. The process integrated the assessment of social and environmental criteria with cost effectiveness analysis, along with analysis of contextual uncertainties and risks, to determine the resilience of the options under different scenarios. The outcome was a portfolio of drought response options that best met the weighted criteria and satisfied their objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 738
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria decision-making process for buildings
    Barcomb, JD
    Curtner, A
    [J]. 35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2000, : 528 - 535
  • [2] Elicitation, Evaluation and Recommendation in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Process
    Tchangani, Ayeley P.
    Peres, Francois
    [J]. 2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CODIT), 2017, : 1107 - 1112
  • [3] Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process
    Socorro Garcia-Cascales, M.
    Teresa Lamata, M.
    Miguel Sanchez-Lozano, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 199 (01) : 373 - 391
  • [4] Collaborative Process Flexibility Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Patiniotakis, Ioannis
    Papageorgiou, Nikos
    Apostolou, Dimitris
    Verginadis, Yiannis
    Mentzas, Gregoris
    [J]. COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS FOR REINDUSTRIALIZATION, 2013, 408 : 691 - 698
  • [5] Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process
    M. Socorro García-Cascales
    M. Teresa Lamata
    J. Miguel Sánchez-Lozano
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2012, 199 : 373 - 391
  • [6] Multi-criteria decision making with overlapping criteria
    Abdulla, Mohammed Shahid
    [J]. IIMB MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 24 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [7] A multi-criteria decision making approach to security assessment of hazardous facilities
    Khakzad, Nima
    Reniers, Genserik
    van Gelder, Pieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 48 : 234 - 243
  • [8] Multi-criteria decision making in ontologies
    Bastinos, Ana Sasa
    Krisper, Marjan
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 222 : 593 - 610
  • [9] Pareto multi-criteria decision making
    Grierson, Donald E.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (03) : 371 - 384
  • [10] Categorization in multi-criteria decision making
    Yager, Ronald R.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 : 416 - 423