External versus Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Comparative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Reddy, Rajeev [1 ]
Reddy, Prajwalli [2 ]
机构
[1] KBN Med Coll, Dept ENT, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
[2] MR Med Coll, Dept Ophthalmol, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
关键词
Dacryocystorhinostomy; Endonasal endoscopy; Epiphora; Nasolacrimal duct obstruction;
D O I
10.17354/ijss/2016/564
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: In past years, external dacryocystorhinostomy has been considered the gold standard in terms of functional outcome for treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. In comparison, interest in the use of the recently developed endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy procedure has been rekindled because of advances in instrumentation. Materials and Methods: This clinical study was conducted at the Department of ENT, KBN Medical College and Department of Opthalmology, MR Medical College, Kalaburagi during the period between June 2015 and November 2015. Results: A total of 50 patients were included in the study which were respectively selected by the authors for the procedure. 30 patients (60%) underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy and the remaining 20 (40%) underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Conclusion: However, there is not much to compare between the two approaches as far as a primary surgery is concerned in terms of success rate as both of them give equally good results in good hands.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 37
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EXTERNAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Sarkar, Phani Kumar
    Nath, Biplab
    Acharjee, Umakanta
    Sarkar, Sandip
    Noatia, Ciranjit
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (13): : 3347 - 3359
  • [2] Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy
    Tsirbas, A
    Davis, G
    Wormald, PJ
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 20 (01): : 50 - 56
  • [3] External dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy
    Häusler, R
    Caversaccio, M
    Jost, M
    Körner, F
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (04) : 647 - 648
  • [4] EXTERNAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY
    Joshi, Vijay
    Titiyal, G. S.
    Gupta, Swati
    Lohani, Kavita
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (12): : 3185 - 3193
  • [5] Conventional dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy-a comparative study
    Saroj, Gupta
    Rashmi, Goyal
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 62 (03): : 296 - 298
  • [6] Conventional dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy-a comparative study
    Gupta Saroj
    Goyal Rashmi
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2010, 62 : 296 - 298
  • [7] Primary external dacryocystorhinostomy versus primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a review
    Lee, Dior W. X.
    Chai, Charmaine H. C.
    Loon, Seng Chee
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 38 (04): : 418 - 426
  • [8] External dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy -: Authors' reply
    Hartikainen, J
    Grenman, R
    Puukka, R
    Seppä, H
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (04) : 648 - 649
  • [9] A comparative study of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy — a preliminary report
    S. David
    R. Raju
    A. Job
    J. Richard
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1999, 52 (1): : 37 - 39
  • [10] Functional outcome of endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy
    Malik, AR
    Elgohary, MA
    Toma, M
    McElvanney, A
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U421 - U421