INTERCLASS RELATIONS IN SOCIETY IN THE STATE FARM 1930-1950 YEARS (ON MATERIALS OF THE EUROPEAN NORTH OF THE RSFSR.

Process of transformation of state-farm society was defined both formation of new rural classes, and folding of the new social relations. The interclass relations arose on the basis of relations of production which inevitably became social, and therefore lay in the basis of all parties of activity of the Soviet farms. The state didn't hurry to define accurately "rule of the game" in the project under the name "state-farm experiment", and therefore life of state-farm society reminded, especially in the 1930th a raging copper. The state-farm society during this period represented difficult developing system and reminded society of a transition period where the real status of the person differed uncertainty and variability. Formation of society of the state capitalism happened on the basis of becoming obsolete traditional agrarian society, and therefore forming of relations of production was interfaced to fight for elimination of a communal and country archetype in system of values and standards of behavior of bulk of state-farm society. In the 1940th folding of classes in state farms generally came to the end, the relations which are based on the principle "who whom" gradually consigned to the past. Into the forefront the relations of production defining a position of a class in state-farm society gradually start moving forward. The protobourgeoisie, the status of "cartridge", established models of elite behavior. For other classes the inclusiveness in paternalistic communications meant the continuous guaranteed access to the economic and social benefits in exchange for a rigid regulation of behavior and nature of interaction. The protobourgeoisie, top of managers and, joined them in the 1950th chief specialists, were the main managers of state-farm resources and masters of destinies of the proletariat. Efficiency and profitability of production was in direct dependence on nature of activity of representatives of these classes. Intellectuals up to the middle of the 1940th. couldn't fit into an economic mechanism of state farms strongly. Only during the post-war period, due to the need of the fastest restoration of farms on condition of poor financing, the intellectual resource became very demanded type of the capital. One of the most isolated groups of rural society were representatives of the working aristocracy. It was young, high-politized, rather educated class openly showing the position. For the period of the 1930-1940th the povinnostny type of behavior of workers in relation to classes of the protobourgeoisie, managers and intellectuals is characteristic. Workers hesitated to declare independently infringement of the rights, to demand the best working conditions and a life. While the patience didn't come to an end, courageously bore rudeness and roughness. The protest of workers during this period was shown in passive forms - dismissal at personal desire from the outcome to the cities or other state farms, truancies, non-performance of duties. Relations of production, being a basis of interclass communication in state-farm society, were shown in economic interests of classes and were incentive motives of labor and household activity of members of state-farm society. The rural society occupying the state-farm territory was promptly transformed from agrarian traditional type to modern society. The paternalism as type of the social and labor relations was predominated in the village during this period and was a special case of manifestation of the Soviet state paternalism.