Data quality, floor and ceiling effects, and test-retest reliability of the Mild Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire

被引:16
|
作者
Dean, Katherine [1 ]
Walker, Zuzana [2 ]
Jenkinson, Crispin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Oxford, England
[2] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
来源
关键词
mild cognitive impairment; health-related quality of life; psychometric; validation;
D O I
10.2147/PROM.S145676
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Mild Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (MCQ) is a 13-item measure that assesses health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with mild cognitive impairment (PWMCI); it has two domains assessing the emotional and practical effects. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the MCQ. Design: This is a longitudinal questionnaire-based study. Setting: The participants were recruited from the memory clinics and research databases in the South of England. Subjects: A total of 299 people aged 50 years and older with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment confirmed within the preceding 12 months. Methods: MCQs were distributed to patients in memory clinics and those listed on research databases. Participants who returned completed questionnaires were sent a second copy of the MCQ to return 2 weeks after receiving the first questionnaire. Results: Five hundred and seven questionnaires were distributed; response rates were 68.2% initially and 89.2% for the second questionnaire. From the returned questionnaires, response rates for each item were high (>98%) and a full range of responses for each item was received with no evidence of significant floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency reliability for both scale scores at both time points was good, with Cronbach's a >= 0.84 in all cases. Test-retest reliability was excellent for both domains with the intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.90 and 0.92 for the practical and emotional domains, respectively. Paired sample t-tests also confirmed the stability of scale score distributions over time. Conclusion: The MCQ has robust psychometric properties, which make it suitable for assessing HRQoL in PWMCI, including comparison of group level data in intervention studies.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 47
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Test-retest reliability of quantitative gait analysis in people with Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Montero-Odasso, M. M.
    Casas, A.
    Hansen, K. T.
    Gutmanis, I.
    Wells, J.
    Bilski, P.
    Borrie, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2008, 56 (04) : S153 - S153
  • [2] Test-Retest Reliability of Resting State Functional Connectivity MRI in Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Schultz, Aaron
    Marshall, Gad
    Chhatwal, Jasmeer
    Rentz, Dorene
    Johnson, Keith
    Ward, Andrew
    Wigman, Sarah
    Hedden, Trey
    Van Dijk, Koene
    McLaren, Donald
    Huijbers, Willem
    Sperling, Reisa
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2013, 80
  • [3] Test-retest discourse performance of individuals with mild cognitive impairment
    Fleming, Valarie B.
    Harris, Joyce L.
    [J]. APHASIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (7-8) : 940 - 950
  • [4] Test-retest reliability of cognitive EEG
    McEvoy, LK
    Smith, ME
    Gevins, A
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 111 (03) : 457 - 463
  • [5] Test-retest reliability of the suicide opinion questionnaire
    Domino, G
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1996, 78 (03) : 1009 - 1010
  • [6] Test-retest reliability of the Cost for Patients Questionnaire
    Poder, Thomas G.
    Coulibaly, Lucien P.
    Hassan, Abakar Idriss
    Conombo, Blanchard
    Laberge, Maude
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, 38 (01)
  • [7] Test-retest reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire
    Jason, Leonard A.
    So, Suzanna
    Brown, Abigail A.
    Sunnquist, Madison
    Evans, Meredyth
    [J]. FATIGUE-BIOMEDICINE HEALTH AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 3 (01): : 16 - 32
  • [8] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE FRANKFURT COMPLAINT QUESTIONNAIRE
    Loas, Gwenole
    Yon, Valerie
    Monestes, Jean Louis
    Cuesta, Manuel J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2011, 108 (02) : 503 - 506
  • [9] Test-retest reliability of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire
    Lam, SSK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 138 (06): : 787 - 788
  • [10] Test-retest reliability of the revised diplopia questionnaire
    Mansukhani, Sasha A.
    Hatt, Sarah R.
    Leske, David A.
    Holmes, Jonathan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2019, 23 (06): : 319 - 320